Re: [netmod] augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK?

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Wed, 18 October 2017 21:36 UTC

Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F4813445B for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 14:36:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2h0newQCDwJn for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 14:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atlas5.jacobs-university.de (atlas5.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 164AC13445C for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 14:36:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (demetrius5.irc-it.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) by atlas5.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D97FFF69; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 23:36:02 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from atlas5.jacobs-university.de ([10.70.0.217]) by localhost (demetrius5.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id jSV3wdO7hRef; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 23:36:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hermes.jacobs-university.de", Issuer "Jacobs University CA - G01" (verified OK)) by atlas5.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 23:36:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (demetrius2.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.47]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5DD9200FC; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 23:36:02 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius2.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XM6CnIaHTYCk; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 23:36:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from elstar.local (elstar.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5351A200F1; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 23:36:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 1356A4132A28; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 23:36:02 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 23:36:01 +0200
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Cc: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20171018213601.hdkt2qtqsno6vr4u@elstar.local>
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <CABCOCHQhPHxen2YD-ZPHqpGZN5YrE_7RVe7_3qUkdazL+PTSmg@mail.gmail.com> <20171015.095206.5556973134711466.mbj@tail-f.com> <CABCOCHR_q8DTF2agDi_VH9pSL8DWV1ttuX=ZZDO9OmNXhAeEsg@mail.gmail.com> <20171018143651.kdsf77r65ptlu4mq@elstar.local> <CABCOCHRVdkjV5PgQ+UtwJMKPLeFRKs_=ogAfTaCGZsWEdgP5uw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CABCOCHRVdkjV5PgQ+UtwJMKPLeFRKs_=ogAfTaCGZsWEdgP5uw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170714 (1.8.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/VTxndHBYhbRw_3TqSpqZEezlRQA>
Subject: Re: [netmod] augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK?
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 21:36:07 -0000

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 01:26:30PM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 7:36 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
> j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 12:56:42PM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >   augment "/if:interfaces-state/if:interface" {
> > > > >     action reset {
> > > > >       description "Reset this interface";
> > > > >     }
> > >
> > > Can you spot the NMDA problem above?
> > > Actually, it exists for in-line definitions, not just augment.
> > >
> > > Once you collapse the interfaces-state tree into /interfaces, there
> > > is no way to specify whether an action is intended for <operational>
> > > or a configuration datastore, or all datastores.
> >
> > I think operations (both RPCs and actions) by default always execute
> > in the context of the operational state datastore. This is consistent
> > with the way we define the xpath context. An operation that operates
> > on other datastores needs to carry this information in its semantics
> > and typically requires special arguments to select the datastores
> > affected. This is how <get-config> and <edit-config> work. Hence, a
> > reset action defined for an interface by default applies to the
> > operational state datastore. And this default makes likely sense for
> > most actions and RPCs.
> >
> > If an action or RPC is expected to operate on a different datastore,
> > the description must explain this and there may be a need to pass a
> > datastore identifier to the operation. [Yes, in retrospect, one might
> > have designed the protocol differently so that there would always be a
> > datastore parameter at the protocol level but its too late for that.]
> >
> >
> 
> IMO this needs to be simple and deterministic.
> All YANG actions in an NMDA server are invoked against <operational>.
>

Well, yes, like all RPC operations - except that we have RPC
operations that do act on other datastores. ;-) But the generic
mechanism including any xpath contexts is against operational.  If the
semantics of the operation that say 'interpret parameter 5 as a
datastore name and act on that datastore', well then this is what the
designer wanted. This is how edit-config and friends work today.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>