Re: [netmod] [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Wed, 10 October 2018 15:35 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C28F7130F47; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 08:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=z+kRPirP; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=dXzt7P2I
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eT1dRMHQRJCc; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 08:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB823130E96; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 08:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7977622148; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 11:35:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 10 Oct 2018 11:35:44 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm1; bh=+ hGLTZWuYvDHLesMN9BRzRi4QrKdzPaoVxUqlR5scVk=; b=z+kRPirPXBjYRzMBb Cac1J8M83dPcfH3Q4vDNd7ZhCjAI2LxZ7DyJMv1YeJafUTQlNubkXY4nEdJmwCXa LOfdXmB7LoGoWqqNxR7Jz/6gZl6VqJ8JhIl3oLrTHtgZArWVIk0sfZ3LNMvY2m5R 92Cihuz3wL2cUMPw4kkLhT+52HNn22y7b4iuhZqqvvg0IXTZOJq1vxMZC1zqrShf /xgtWLnxmASv51o9O3I05tx4djis26Hi/dQlbdIX9DzE9XDwZdLckny56I5BSldL ugRQNWQxB2jHUFiJjpjqz7s21Eib9M0wTxgqjQWz0KDH6e73662MFpAXflMacEuD R8ZTg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=+hGLTZWuYvDHLesMN9BRzRi4QrKdzPaoVxUqlR5sc Vk=; b=dXzt7P2I75HOrn+mLfIPxIUw2yi4n84DpMYhrFhKQM1j15lKvHf9xcPcJ n5Zik+ujGnIvWtppJsK6KF19imsG+/OXdtSTXEI9z9LLbYe09NgfR/XmaJtK7Gpy BNkGBs+J7l0qAc+b+glE0DS94GHPFLUM4ce7q3vvUMZv5uUwSMlnLAcXv2uhmT9I Hot850D8gEH60dl7Kbdr3IgHDD0lDV8rtEYq/ZwoiVfGclU/wbfcXzpxV7XbWHHH 8ZCdCOKnpwIQLC681LtshjxjOGuEL841AfnkNgqTr264C5rzK8XC7D7bK0cNSjIp kxv8OT8apj+eQ2Mb9B0DDXSsTRxjw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Txy-W0xroaJha9ebTIJiAAEs3p1i0Gz5mTotSBsliw6HdX84Ew10uw>
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Txy-W8ZCS7gNFIYSN2NckGFKcmAgdGlYFPLhWziozSibY8JH7J7V3Q> <xmx:Txy-W3TRc3lmsJgqIwgYD7rbTi-fsQkuv4A1-c1jLfiVQA0yQTjbHQ> <xmx:Txy-W0RtRsrkawP92k0bAT7J7y8Q-f_nXtOdarXpu8_CNWrVhKdnkg> <xmx:Txy-Wy1ViADZjYEAOBh9rCIf3i2vk5RuNlF9mzYE09JsMRN8hQwowQ> <xmx:Txy-W0yHlngWOp0iPaToiXLAWP4bNq_80pCPuuSthUSDoWNf8dZ-Dw> <xmx:UBy-W2W14mBV38F5EvHlWshNmMtc7syAPMYeMSVSGDmlRRUgAYgkhA>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro5.cisco.com (nccm-cmcs-client.cisco.com [173.38.117.70]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4DF62E4532; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 11:35:43 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <f8d66a50-a0a4-7ef0-df1a-320c4979a4e7@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 11:35:41 -0400
Cc: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount.all@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A82C6853-2A8F-4AAD-ADD3-B387CC037CFA@cooperw.in>
References: <153862099823.8954.12813773940704626148@ietfa.amsl.com> <20181004.120601.2031947201933436857.mbj@tail-f.com> <f8d66a50-a0a4-7ef0-df1a-320c4979a4e7@joelhalpern.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/ZeLrkRQCZtCdH_QiDI-cCntKsXw>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 15:35:48 -0000

Joel, thanks for your reviews. Martin, thanks for your responses. I entered a No Objection ballot.

I do think the new text in Section 1 helps clarify the scope of the server’s responsibility (for me, at least).

Alissa

> On Oct 4, 2018, at 8:35 AM, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
> 
> I had thought we had discussed sufficient edits.  When I looked at the diff, what I saw helped some, but still left me concerned.
> Yours,
> Joel
> 
> On 10/4/18 6:06 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
>>> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
>>> Review result: Ready with Issues
>>> 
>>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
>>> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
>>> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
>>> 
>>> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>>> 
>>> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>>> 
>>> Document: draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-??
>>> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
>>> Review Date: 2018-10-03
>>> IETF LC End Date: 2018-06-29
>>> IESG Telechat date: 2018-10-11
>>> 
>>> Summary: This document seems to meet the specific requirements for publication
>>> as a proposed standard.
>>> 
>>> Major issues:
>>>     It is still this reviewer's opinion that for a reader who has not been
>>>     involved in the discussion in the working group, the document is quite
>>>     unclear and confusing.   For somewhat more details, please see my previous
>>>     review at
>>>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-10-genart-lc-halpern-2018-06-28/
>> I'm sorry to hear that you find it confusing.  I was under the
>> impression that the edits that we made after your previous review were
>> sufficient.
>> /martin
>>> 
>>> Minor issues:
>>>     N/A
>>> 
>>> Nits/editorial comments:
>>>     N/A
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> netmod mailing list
>>> netmod@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art