Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-02
Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Mon, 27 May 2019 11:04 UTC
Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE571200B6; Mon, 27 May 2019 04:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vAmOLD2G9COb; Mon, 27 May 2019 04:04:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 869CA120046; Mon, 27 May 2019 04:04:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [173.38.220.61]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B67B1AE08D8; Mon, 27 May 2019 13:04:08 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 13:04:12 +0200
Message-Id: <20190527.130412.1876961670794351457.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: lberger@labn.net
Cc: netmod@ietf.org, netmod-chairs@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <e6fc4541-891a-60cb-e956-86f238d09f14@labn.net>
References: <e6fc4541-891a-60cb-e956-86f238d09f14@labn.net>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.2 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/dbDQV7RW65s1j0Y_zJesnfJkQR8>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-02
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 11:04:13 -0000
Hi, I have reviewed draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-02, and here are my comments: o 6 Perhaps: OLD: begins at the first non- whitespace character on the following line. NEW: begins at the first character that is not a space character (' ') on the following line. The algorithm talks specifically about space (' ') rather than whitespace. o 6.1 s/is exists/exists/ o 6.1 / 6.2 6.2 says (correctly!): It is RECOMMENDED for implementations to first attempt to fold content using the single backslash strategy and, only in the unlikely event that it cannot fold the input or the folding logic is unable to cope with a contingency occurring on the desired folding column, then fallback to the double backslash strategy. But 6.1 says about the Single Backslash Strategy: automation implementations are likely to encounter scenarios that will produce errors without special care So it 6.1 thinks it is likely that SBS won't work, but 6.2 says it is unlikely. IMO 6.2 is correct - it is extremely unlikely that SBS won't work. o 7.1.2 / 7.2 I would prefer if the format is defined with descriptive text, rather than with an algorithm. It is the end result that matters, not which algorithm an implementation uses to get to the result. I suggest the algorithm is moved to an appendix, and/or a sentence is added that explains that the algorithm is just an example. Also expand the descriptive text in 7.1.2; I think that the text in section 6 is probably enough. However, there are some important details buried in the desciption of the algorithm; specifically the cases where SBS can't be used. o 7.2.1 I don't understand why there is a min limit of 46 characters for folding to work. If the only reason is for the non-normative script to be able to center the header line, then I think this limitation should be removed. (I would even prefer less flexibility in the header line syntax...) o 7.2.1 / 7.2.2 I don't think the text should assume that folding/unfolding is "automated". o 7.2.1 Perhaps add to bullet 1: If no such location can be found, then exit (this text content cannot be folded) o 7.2.2 s/maximum../maximum./ o Appendix A Consider using the command "tempfile" instead of /tmp/wip* /martin
- [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-artw… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-artw… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-artw… Qin Wu
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-artw… wangzitao
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-artw… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-artw… Italo Busi
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-artw… Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-artw… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-artw… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-artw… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-artw… Italo Busi
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-artw… Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-artw… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-artw… Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-artw… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-artw… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-artw… Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-artw… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-artw… Italo Busi
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-artw… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-artw… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-artw… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-artw… Lou Berger