Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree output

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Wed, 20 September 2017 11:46 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E421330B1 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 04:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9s9TduhPBFgQ for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 04:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.18.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64EB713309C for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 04:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmgw4 (unknown [10.0.90.85]) by gproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C3B1E0C92 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 05:46:48 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw4 with id Bnmk1w01M2SSUrH01nmnp5; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 05:46:48 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=OZLoNlbY c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=2JCJgTwv5E4A:10 a=lI54y5JCEApwcvzhCeQA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=0XVbEFIILj/olGVXXYyM+I/VXUSaqiQi3P0bBo7bxSM=; b=vtcoroc8lfpA+0bVPfvLm4dMbt g/ALY81c0hInFIrvkC8fL7+zNlJAqNYBNeez1qCoRYYEmoNDCVNqhpOakC3KIfeihpBu9lLxKwvoi G4pbtxHJWqLPBtrNR3bGEAlrE;
Received: from pool-100-15-84-20.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.84.20]:39886 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1dudSm-000mhi-Q3; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 05:46:44 -0600
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
Cc: rwilton@cisco.com, netmod@ietf.org
References: <20170919.154728.285206235172744617.mbj@tail-f.com> <4f17fbca-6282-6b27-b390-9b85779e96da@cisco.com> <cc7c1cad-f394-c3c9-187f-77b7ac8824f2@labn.net> <20170920.084016.1173553333008898354.mbj@tail-f.com>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <092315ab-a60e-8af4-bcae-b52b26634782@labn.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 07:46:42 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170920.084016.1173553333008898354.mbj@tail-f.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.84.20
X-Exim-ID: 1dudSm-000mhi-Q3
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-84-20.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([IPv6:::1]) [100.15.84.20]:39886
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 7
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/q0-95LxSxty1q-TaFuWYHQHBA5Q>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree output
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 11:46:51 -0000


On 9/20/2017 2:40 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>>> As for what the precise definition of '/' and '@' should be, I'm not 
>>> sure.  I think that you and Lou have a better handle on that ;-)
> Since Lou and I have different opinions on this, it would be very
> useful to hear what others think.

I completely agree that hearing from the WG makes sense (I can also take
this to the users in the RTG WG and see if there is any input from that
WG). 

Obviously, if there's no consensus for these symbols at this time,
they're dropped!

Thanks ,
Lou
(as contributor)