Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree output

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 15 September 2017 13:56 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24A941332DA for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 06:56:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eElIt3HIjUKU for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 06:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46B951332D7 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 06:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3614; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1505483784; x=1506693384; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=CbD7QImOE21vobEc2szvpHyqS1HajHfvhP8BOIzypdg=; b=HZHn6q78REdfuME1lQxf/LdfIsjiF1MZVVcu+W95rz/t3VtSzFMlSP5f aGiNLIGYpTfCPa+zbK32NqmsfxOOZMB6Z6vrnpu84mgsGU6HriJkWr1tO GMskMOM/CXKoaySCGGmOhkHZvBB5CN7sYEi20f1dgrXzKcLHABs5XjWOt Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CrAACt2rtZ/5hdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBg1pkbicHg26KII9zgXSWJ4ISChgLhEpPAhqEED8YAQIBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BayiFGQEBAQMBASEEDTobAgEGAhgCAiYCAgIlCxUQAgQBEoozEI4RnWaBbTqLM?= =?us-ascii?q?gEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR2BDoIdggKGW4R4gxOCYAWMKIUHj1UCh1m?= =?us-ascii?q?MeoJukAqVBQIRGQGBOAEfOIENdxVJhxx2iAKBDwEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,397,1500940800"; d="scan'208";a="285420734"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Sep 2017 13:56:23 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (xch-rtp-012.cisco.com [64.101.220.152]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v8FDuNQ8021128 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 15 Sep 2017 13:56:23 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 09:56:22 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 09:56:22 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree output
Thread-Index: AQHTLW7ooMSJJm/gdkGnL0U2wTeGA6K0yJQAgAE4cwD///jZAA==
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 13:56:22 +0000
Message-ID: <D5E153B9.C80CF%acee@cisco.com>
References: <9d84d068-29ba-8e89-394f-b7f6a5272adc@cisco.com> <CABCOCHQZ4zJ3p_4oB1Pu=1H60btzrccqTx7rUtsRsF0reXgrYw@mail.gmail.com> <1505470900.18681.0.camel@nic.cz>
In-Reply-To: <1505470900.18681.0.camel@nic.cz>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.117.47]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <8F9AB2F8BD42CA438B287F2E8313F806@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/uCWVwRy6VpeUfOUfSFuEFSwHOXs>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree output
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 13:56:26 -0000

+1 - Also it is hard enough to format the tree output to fit in a draft
w/o further annotations (even with —-tree-line-length).
Thanks,
Acee


On 9/15/17, 6:21 AM, "netmod on behalf of Ladislav Lhotka"
<netmod-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of lhotka@nic.cz> wrote:

>Andy Bierman píše v Čt 14. 09. 2017 v 08:43 -0700:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> 
>> Actually I liked the early pyang output that was concise and easy to
>>remember.
>> The current format gets very cluttered and there are too many little
>>symbols
>> to remember them all.
>
>I agree.
>
>Lada
>
>> 
>> 
>> Andy
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Joe Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com> wrote:
>> > I've been hacking on pyang, and I changed tree.py to add the enum
>>values
>> > for enumeration types and identiyref bases for identityref types.
>>Here
>> > is an example:
>> > 
>> > module: yang-catalog
>> >     +--rw catalog
>> >        +--rw modules
>> >        |  +--rw module* [name revision organization]
>> >        |     +--rw name                     yang:yang-identifier
>> >        |     +--rw revision                 union
>> >        |     +--rw organization             string
>> >        |     +--rw ietf
>> >        |     |  +--rw ietf-wg?   string
>> >        |     +--rw namespace                inet:uri
>> >        |     +--rw schema?                  inet:uri
>> >        |     +--rw generated-from?          enumeration [mib, code,
>> > not-applicable, native]
>> >        |     +--rw maturity-level?          enumeration [ratified,
>> > adopted, initial, not-applicable]
>> > ...
>> >                                +--rw protocols
>> >                                |  +--rw protocol* [name]
>> >                                |     +--rw name
>> > identityref -> protocol
>> > ...
>> > 
>> > My questions are:
>> > 
>> > 1. Is this useful?
>> > 
>> > 2. If so, can this be added to pyang (happy to submit a PR) and
>> > draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams?
>> > 
>> > 3. What changes to the output format would you recommend?
>> > 
>> > Thanks.
>> > 
>> > Joe
>> > 
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > netmod mailing list
>> > netmod@ietf.org
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> netmod@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>-- 
>Ladislav Lhotka
>Head, CZ.NIC Labs
>PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67
>
>_______________________________________________
>netmod mailing list
>netmod@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod