IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] [yang-doctors] Quirky YANG

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Thu, 04 October 2018 00:14 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674DE130DD0; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 17:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kH19_O7bXYnL; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 17:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x435.google.com (mail-pf1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::435]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68F81130DCD; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 17:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x435.google.com with SMTP id r64-v6so2431489pfb.13; Wed, 03 Oct 2018 17:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=nBNNrJjwS88RP3pBB1ViUoxbUjt61kHJzSEIbXa5+7M=; b=TjVWjpcVnFHWrvtPaVNAQpTWNZMnnBZkZZx2L06Do7Q+4ZlstACL3BXWbHGWWVF6TS NwymLik0kTF2yf7Jc8V27R37s1L9wmEMEP0yJgGc+xPTq4ghDBdx3BOfqeyhFhx+dUYx rvliwFFQka/EnSeMhmdf+xb8i1B/v12iJTjeiMC4Egx5uZ9+dP5gvUMgGhzqTxOMqEcz yCrjRkvSYlU3aUMwYeHO/EgXR8+5SKGh91CzFdgo6f6q5hRf1N1YPBta4zQMWitwC+y0 D5dhLkDFHD8ISGRnK6+VdlRDIlipkM4b7vZgXHiNnP86lTYK/mpwYrJ5RLE1okqO1Ed2 e8aQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=nBNNrJjwS88RP3pBB1ViUoxbUjt61kHJzSEIbXa5+7M=; b=PE7OiMuwhW6pOWtj+K3G8oYpytbrHuY1mRj4LZc5AiQIxX7yvybut/JAdesQh7WLTT xgg+cskQ4m9m8TyQZowTXjSB8LMnOal0KvH5jAdOMgWvKGMDTB2JI6E0AuSmBt7llknI l6/LlBZe4llqQQ8y5GJS0+e5eCVJxNNGeUhGjffOxqMprj9BKTqKELpOt5s8IfFOonBe Q5yHVb9GJ8cbbo+RZWYuAx0dIUq1TP04OwPO5Tjd+GOjTlAEv16+DzWFofAYjLv0lOZU op0ys7XFtAy6clyCWJ7QTFk8dOI5pkg1sNlvM4ogpDe8Rf2ym236152jrSsvzk90OXpW hPwQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfohA8+ixtEOtA52bYbfiIKUL+PI2GC2ofGFdQfdT9CVsovcduKTk pwusaSlBDz6r01EibZ4dJy0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV611egdFaB4eSbx3b0/OOPGCTerwP+t9a6jWvO86prxPpuikGMlVL1pFHnxR35oEbsbF3wBIeA==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:e05:: with SMTP id d5-v6mr3418254pgl.272.1538612087490; Wed, 03 Oct 2018 17:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.52.174.170] ([66.170.99.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w127-v6sm3769783pfd.112.2018.10.03.17.14.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Oct 2018 17:14:46 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_24434DE6-BE08-4EAD-AA75-F0D839959347"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <C0D31E51-4EAA-4FFA-BFC6-FE2DE900047B@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 17:14:45 -0700
Cc: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>, YANG Doctors <yang-doctors@ietf.org>, Ian Farrer <ianfarrer@gmx.com>, Yong Cui <cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn>, terry.manderson@icann.org, Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <D584FB5A-D724-4CAB-9CBA-87F8E9D978F7@gmail.com>
References: <AD038D55-D011-4569-AA79-555AC9B2D766@cisco.com> <EAE2FE54-C63D-491A-B022-B8978E26521D@gmail.com> <C0D31E51-4EAA-4FFA-BFC6-FE2DE900047B@cisco.com>
To: Reshad Rehman <rrahman@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/tXWuZT79sN1fr2BOhArFpvZW0hw>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 05 Oct 2018 05:11:15 -0700
Subject: Re: [netmod] [yang-doctors] Quirky YANG
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:14:52 -0000

[Adding softwire chairs, document shepherd, and AD, and moving netmod to Bcc]

Yes.

> On Oct 3, 2018, at 4:51 PM, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) <rrahman@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Mahesh. So the IESG is supposed to ask for YD review at this point for draft-ietf-softwire-yang?
>  
> From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
> Date: Wednesday, October 3, 2018 at 7:38 PM
> To: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>
> Cc: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, YANG Doctors <yang-doctors@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] [netmod] Quirky YANG
>  
>   <>
> 
> 
>> On Oct 3, 2018, at 2:41 PM, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) <rrahman@cisco.com <mailto:rrahman@cisco.com>> wrote:
>>  
>> Are YD reviews optional for IETF YANG modules? I assumed it was mandatory.
>  
> Here is what it says on the YD page:
>  
> All YANG documents will be passed by a YANG doctor reviewer before they will be approved by the IESG. The YANG doctor review must be done after the Working Group Last Call and before the IETF Last Call. ADs and WG chairs responsible on I-Ds that include YANG documents should ask the OPS ADs for a review as soon as the document completed WGLC. Failing that request, the review will be conducted during the IETF Last Call.
>  
> Mahesh Jethanandani
> mjethanandani@gmail.com <mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email