Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-15
Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Mon, 22 January 2018 21:55 UTC
Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1C412D7EE for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:55:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4OseMBUIiln8 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:55:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62E9D12D7E9 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:55:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=39042; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1516658120; x=1517867720; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=z0jgHX2W98b3e4YbXIdh3Zcboi2BNceuAK5ecnq6bG4=; b=QVAIaqm4YFZG96IoeuRJp0gzKQH4NYKQK+qlJfmcq1PF9IqlDKf7gZMu /A6drszOQUmCWU0p4mKxJOdelbxKPGUjnJuU3sGyn+bx1RTyXK9jWU384 CPEFqPOLn/CfYjAJjZI5MAN0Q/ShWOL+Xdpk/mHdmuoiLlXuxf1QdzTQB s=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DCAQBfXGZa/xbLJq1eGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYQodCeDXYsYj0IyiQ+ORIICBwMYAQyBNwGDD08CGoUuFAEBAQEBAQEBAWsohSQBAQQBASFLCxAJAg4KIAcDAgICHwYfEQYNBgIBAYoXAxUQlyCdcIInJoceDYJoAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBDgoFhEmFfYMFgmtEAQECgTwBEgE2FQqCYYJlBaM9PYRdgjGBBYhEhQSCG4Yfg3GHdI1RQ4kzgTw2ImBwMhoIGxU9giqEWEA3BYgogjwBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,398,1511827200"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="1540674"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Jan 2018 21:55:18 +0000
Received: from [10.61.198.231] ([10.61.198.231]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w0MLtHoq030030; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 21:55:17 GMT
To: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Cc: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <8C19AD4C-0DCA-4D96-A070-0D76BE92BFA4@juniper.net> <1e5da232-82cd-5a1a-930e-555796bd2ef7@cisco.com> <0480E3FD-BFAC-41F5-8408-3DAB117A8625@gmail.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <171620d8-1f64-cf62-4dc2-5790f133da33@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 22:55:16 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0480E3FD-BFAC-41F5-8408-3DAB117A8625@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aIRAjPNwBhBvBsmIkrWkdSvS9Dw0F92jI"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/zzqQm6hg5IlJ--VBzPJez0VW3Io>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-15
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 21:55:25 -0000
I'm ok with this as well, Mahesh. Thanks, Eliot On 22.01.18 22:48, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote: > Eliot, > > I am not sure about what is a basic function, and what is not. > Tomorrow, somebody can argue that TCP SYN flag is a basic function and > should be broken out from under the TCP header. > > I would rather that port definition remain under TCP/UDP with the > feature statement ‘match-on-tcp’ and ‘match-on-udp’. The proposed > change then looks like what is here > <https://github.com/netmod-wg/acl-model/pull/23/commits/dc4ed556bd71cb9e648b0babdebe05a3a5b7bf68>, > and all the changes in the PR are captured here > <https://github.com/netmod-wg/acl-model/pull/23>. > > Thanks > >> On Jan 22, 2018, at 11:14 AM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com >> <mailto:lear@cisco.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi Kent and Mahesh and Sonal, >> >> Thanks very much for working on this draft. I have noted one problem >> that I think needs correcting. I come prepared with a diff. >> >> The current model has {source,dest}-port-or-range hanging off ipv4 or >> ipv6. This is a transport parameter and is not appropriate for >> protocols that do not use ports (ie, ICMP, ESP, etc). A better >> locale would be to hang these components underneath l4 underneath >> their respective tcp and udp branches. >> >> Because this is so basic a function, I propose that this *not* be >> included in match-on-tcp or match-on-udp. Instead, the contents of >> both tcp and udp be moved to new containers "tcp-all" and "udp-all", >> respectively, and the ports hang as peers to that. Thus, if a very >> simple device can understand TCP and UDP ports but cannot understand >> more detailed information, that is supported. >> >> And so from a tree perspective, it would look like this: >> >> >> | | +--rw (l4)? >> | | | +--:(tcp) >> | | | | +--rw tcp >> | | | | +--rw source-port-range-or-operator >> | | | | | +--rw (port-range-or-operator)? >> | | | | | +--:(range) >> | | | | | | +--rw lower-port inet:port-number >> | | | | | | +--rw upper-port inet:port-number >> | | | | | +--:(operator) >> | | | | | +--rw operator? operator >> | | | | | +--rw port inet:port-number >> | | | | +--rw destination-port-range-or-operator >> | | | | | +--rw (port-range-or-operator)? >> | | | | | +--:(range) >> | | | | | | +--rw lower-port inet:port-number >> | | | | | | +--rw upper-port inet:port-number >> | | | | | +--:(operator) >> | | | | | +--rw operator? operator >> | | | | | +--rw port inet:port-number >> | | | | +--rw tcp-all {match-on-tcp}? >> | | | | +--rw sequence-number? uint32 >> | | | | +--rw acknowledgement-number? uint32 >> | | | | +--rw data-offset? uint8 >> | | | | +--rw reserved? uint8 >> | | | | +--rw flags? bits >> | | | | +--rw window-size? uint16 >> | | | | +--rw urgent-pointer? uint16 >> | | | | +--rw options? uint32 >> | | | +--:(udp) >> | | | | +--rw udp >> | | | | +--rw source-port-range-or-operator >> | | | | | +--rw (port-range-or-operator)? >> | | | | | +--:(range) >> | | | | | | +--rw lower-port inet:port-number >> | | | | | | +--rw upper-port inet:port-number >> | | | | | +--:(operator) >> | | | | | +--rw operator? operator >> | | | | | +--rw port inet:port-number >> | | | | +--rw destination-port-range-or-operator >> | | | | | +--rw (port-range-or-operator)? >> | | | | | +--:(range) >> | | | | | | +--rw lower-port inet:port-number >> | | | | | | +--rw upper-port inet:port-number >> | | | | | +--:(operator) >> | | | | | +--rw operator? operator >> | | | | | +--rw port inet:port-number >> | | | | +--rw udp-all {match-on-udp}? >> | | | | +--rw length? uint16 >> >> >> A diff ietf-packet-fields.yang and ietf-access-control-lists.yang is >> attached. >> >> Eliot >> >> >> >> On 17.01.18 22:55, Kent Watsen wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> This starts a two-week working group last call on >>> draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-15. >>> >>> This working group last call ends on January 31st. >>> Please send your comments to the NETMOD mailing list. >>> >>> Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document >>> and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome! >>> This is useful and important, even from authors. >>> >>> Also, could the authors, explicitly CC-ed on this email, >>> please confirm at this time that they are unaware of >>> any IPR related to this draft. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> NETMOD Chairs >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> netmod mailing list >>> netmod@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >>> >> >> *** ietf-packet-fields@2018-01-16.yang.orig >> <mailto:ietf-packet-fields@2018-01-16.yang.orig>Mon Jan 22 12:58:08 2018 >> --- ietf-packet-fields@2018-01-16.yang >> <mailto:ietf-packet-fields@2018-01-16.yang>Mon Jan 22 13:10:57 2018 >> *************** >> *** 190,205 **** >> payload. In IPv6, this field is known as 'next-header."; >> reference "RFC 719, RFC 2460."; >> } >> - container source-port-range-or-operator { >> - uses port-range-or-operator; >> - description >> - "Source port definition."; >> - } >> - container destination-port-range-or-operator { >> - uses port-range-or-operator; >> - description >> - "Destination port definition."; >> - } >> } >> >> grouping acl-ipv4-header-fields { >> --- 190,195 ---- >> *** ietf-access-control-list@2018-01-16.yang.orig >> <mailto:ietf-access-control-list@2018-01-16.yang.orig>Mon Jan 22 >> 10:16:17 2018 >> --- ietf-access-control-list@2018-01-16.yang >> <mailto:ietf-access-control-list@2018-01-16.yang>Mon Jan 22 13:09:06 2018 >> *************** >> *** 440,457 **** >> >> choice l4 { >> container tcp { >> ! if-feature match-on-tcp; >> uses packet-fields:acl-tcp-header-fields; >> ! description >> "Rule set that matches TCP headers."; >> ! } >> ! >> container udp { >> ! if-feature match-on-udp; >> ! uses packet-fields:acl-udp-header-fields; >> ! description >> ! "Rule set that matches UDP headers."; >> ! } >> >> container icmp { >> if-feature match-on-icmp; >> --- 440,482 ---- >> >> choice l4 { >> container tcp { >> ! container source-port-range-or-operator { >> ! uses packet-fields:port-range-or-operator; >> ! description >> ! "Source port definition."; >> ! } >> ! container destination-port-range-or-operator { >> ! uses packet-fields:port-range-or-operator; >> ! description >> ! "Destination port definition."; >> ! } >> ! container tcp-all { >> ! if-feature match-on-tcp; >> uses packet-fields:acl-tcp-header-fields; >> ! description >> "Rule set that matches TCP headers."; >> ! } >> ! description "TCP matchable characteristics"; >> ! } >> container udp { >> ! container source-port-range-or-operator { >> ! uses packet-fields:port-range-or-operator; >> ! description >> ! "Source port definition."; >> ! } >> ! container destination-port-range-or-operator { >> ! uses packet-fields:port-range-or-operator; >> ! description >> ! "Destination port definition."; >> ! } >> ! container udp-all { >> ! if-feature match-on-udp; >> ! uses packet-fields:acl-udp-header-fields; >> ! description >> ! "Rule set that matches UDP headers."; >> ! } >> ! description "UDP matchable characteristics"; >> ! } >> >> container icmp { >> if-feature match-on-icmp; >> _______________________________________________ >> netmod mailing list >> netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > Mahesh Jethanandani > mjethanandani@gmail.com <mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com> >
- [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-mode… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-… Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-… Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-… Sonal Agarwal
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-… Sonal Agarwal
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-… Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-… Eliot Lear
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-… Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-… Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-… Eliot Lear
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-… Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-… Eliot Lear
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-… Alex Campbell
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-… Eliot Lear
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-… Eliot Lear
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-… Kristian Larsson
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-… Eliot Lear
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-… Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-… Kent Watsen