IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-15

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Fri, 19 January 2018 18:42 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9010C129C51 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:42:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id elM-xxlVPSWo for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:42:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot0-x22d.google.com (mail-ot0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBB42128959 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:42:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id x4so2213483otg.7 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:42:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=n3bvsD3cyjcXjFX5Cs9ir1UqQ3OLB6bar/ieBx3dIAs=; b=hEgSXCeJM6uNc2JhabL9lUEvrQTKd3t+vompTbWMuqDWUt8yw8ZvN8ca4C8dnpPFIH lURDuYIwkC8mSEBEK/VvWKokD+qQTQ6wl+xQrVE8WqLzpR0vDNgMs6OXaAPm2C6HTmJ/ H8CFcfWGsbrrlhTJ4bmuZ1GWZfxUSDu4IY1BXZODsoXTNTgaeY4elhDMMrxIsQc1ncgb W+w1R6I7cEeAAZ+zVj0tfQiU8IZw99th5bsVckdh5P75unX4JZUSN/XqPJy9kca6/5vL ji3VbVrtUWwVUGlNP7XnWNlPXKa21aNJp7zU083AifDR0QLUSZYoi1mhhRzMJLCZCKod w9DA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=n3bvsD3cyjcXjFX5Cs9ir1UqQ3OLB6bar/ieBx3dIAs=; b=W2NCI9SxpPNfjRxFaIJfeuu9XGMbjr4hmMKHFcsN64+A+wWqHMXB55/1JhHIG7O9op zBO96fbpGxCjVzHBZXNGp0q8wz4UZZal+KOUhalTh+PRhNvevkggK/EQXA8E4Y5yOOqO pW/0uTC1+wcbHdWfRA0DfxGGEjO6XkG67LZXEliJD0I60DK+Y1yVM+L70m8KZd6XQtbW wLUdTXVc7ILL6SaGifCwvCIrbEdH7jl+CyjsC5WAhu7X80PugVAO/7fpZB/8sFgVxqsT 3E2qsTZ2UMEchPFhLlSzaweP/cjZBbMQVHXL3GL/dUB9dMWavV1KFmfmc2Eal3dJ38TU 8YpA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytdZ6ufQI05DNFlfNQGByowe48gh0r6AB6lqMKiMPxek3Pzf6MTt B9IQEBCUJIE/ZxymYBuvOS0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovc/xoYRXgierP81bxEKQYh03N4AuU8hmMfvfEjCriR1VRTI6uzcT9rNWI/iz57IQm1jT9ojw==
X-Received: by 10.157.27.171 with SMTP id z40mr5821327otd.357.1516387358333; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:42:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mahesh-m-m8d1.attlocal.net ([2600:1700:edb0:8fd0:e935:89d3:e703:5695]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 74sm3913078otv.28.2018.01.19.10.42.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:42:37 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BA276029-048F-4B80-A104-924DD1C488F1@juniper.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:42:35 -0800
Cc: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4EB04703-CD66-43D3-8653-BFC62B2C0FA1@gmail.com>
References: <8C19AD4C-0DCA-4D96-A070-0D76BE92BFA4@juniper.net> <20180117224916.4xtwnxgsw3snzwvf@elstar.local> <B3AAE9DB-1F4B-40F5-91BC-7A283B6E5F8B@gmail.com> <BA276029-048F-4B80-A104-924DD1C488F1@juniper.net>
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/S1S7-q9_bbbtm3zYbH00nPxY3rw>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-15
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 18:42:52 -0000

Kent,

I have not heard a strong requirement to have the open issue fixed in this version of the RFC. We would therefore like to defer it to a bis document.

I will wait for the LC to complete, and update the draft to address all the comments received during the LC.

Thanks.

> On Jan 17, 2018, at 3:33 PM, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> H Mahesh,
> 
>>> - There is an open issue in the document (section 8) - are we going
>>> to resolve that during WG last call or is this a leftover?
>> 
>> This will be resolved in the next version of the module. It is
>> documented under Issues tab in GitHub. Should we remove it from
>> the draft?
> 
> Most of Juergen's comments are editorial in nature and can truly be handled as part of the LC process, but this open issue has me worried, as it may result in a significant technical change.  
> 
> What will it take to close this open issue?  Is it just a matter of the getting the WG to agree that it's not an issue, or do we already know that it is a real issue and only the solution is pending?
> 
> Thanks,
> Kent
> 
> 
> 
> 

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email