Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call
Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com> Wed, 13 October 2004 09:07 UTC
Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu (root@darkwing.uoregon.edu [128.223.142.13]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA04571 for <newtrk-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 05:07:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9D8otNc020549; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 01:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i9D8otNI020547; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 01:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtagate2.de.ibm.com (mtagate2.de.ibm.com [195.212.29.151]) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9D8orLA020504 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 01:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate2.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9D8okFW107478; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 08:50:46 GMT
Received: from sihl.zurich.ibm.com (sihl.zurich.ibm.com [9.4.16.232]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id i9D8okgC117238; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:50:46 +0200
Received: from zurich.ibm.com (dhcp21-82.zurich.ibm.com [9.4.21.82]) by sihl.zurich.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA102964; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:50:45 +0200
Message-ID: <416CDC94.2030509@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:43:16 +0200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en, fr, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: scott bradner <sob@harvard.edu>
CC: newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu
Subject: Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call
References: <20041012172639.284C7DAA95@newdev.harvard.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20041012172639.284C7DAA95@newdev.harvard.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
My answer is "yes" but with one qualification: although this is a separable idea, I don't think we should finalize it until we have something approaching a consensus on what we will do to the standards track as a whole. For example, if we did reduce the standards track to a single maturity level, the details of the cruft committee's work would need a little fine tuning. As to why my answer is "yes", I think this is really a no-brainer. Having cruft parked on the standards/BCP track is just another way of confusing the users of IETF documents. Brian scott bradner wrote: > I'd like to do sort of a last call on the crufty ID > (draft-ietf-newtrk-cruft-00.txt) > > I do not want to last call the document itself instead I'd like to last > call the concept of this document > > so the specific details of the process proposed in the ID are off-topic > but the idea of having a process to perform "the downgrading of old > standards described in RFC 2026, as well as BCPs, without placing > an unreasonable load on groups charged with performing other tasks in > the IETF" is in-scope > > consider this question > "should this working group develop process(es) with the aims > described in the ID draft-ietf-newtrk-cruft-00.txt?" > > please answer with "yes" "no" or "maybe" > > please give a SHORT explanation of why for an answer of "yes" or "no" > > if you answer "maybe" please state why you cannot answer "yes" or "no" > > this sort-of-last-call will end in two weeks (Oct 26) at noon ET > > if there is no clear consensus (or a consensus for "maybe") we can talk > about the question during the newtrk session in DC, if there is a clear > consensus of "no" we will drop the idea, and if the clear consensus > is "yes" we will then discuss the specifics of the proposal. > > thanks > > Scott > . > newtrk resources:_____________________________________________________ > web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk.html > mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk/index.html > . newtrk resources:_____________________________________________________ web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk.html mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk/index.html
- RE: [newtrk] a crufty last call Larry Masinter
- [newtrk] a crufty last call scott bradner
- Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call Eliot Lear
- RE: [newtrk] a crufty last call john.loughney
- RE: [newtrk] a crufty last call Lars-Erik Jonsson (LU/EAB)
- Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call Susan Harris
- Timing (Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call) Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- RE: [newtrk] a crufty last call Christian Huitema
- Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call Kurt D. Zeilenga
- Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call Paul Hoffman / VPNC
- Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call David Meyer
- Re: Timing (Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call Eliot Lear
- Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call Alex Rousskov
- Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call Pekka Savola
- Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- RE: [newtrk] a crufty last call Larry Masinter
- RE: [newtrk] a crufty last call john.loughney
- RE: [newtrk] a crufty last call Pekka Savola