[newtrk] a crufty last call
sob@harvard.edu (scott bradner) Tue, 12 October 2004 17:55 UTC
Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu (root@darkwing.uoregon.edu [128.223.142.13]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA14223 for <newtrk-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:55:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9CHQkir020931; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i9CHQk1M020923; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from newdev.harvard.edu (newdev.eecs.harvard.edu [140.247.60.212]) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9CHQjs0020615 for <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:26:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by newdev.harvard.edu (Postfix, from userid 501) id 284C7DAA95; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:26:39 -0400 (EDT)
To: newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu
Subject: [newtrk] a crufty last call
Message-Id: <20041012172639.284C7DAA95@newdev.harvard.edu>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:26:39 -0400
From: sob@harvard.edu
Sender: owner-newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: sob@harvard.edu
I'd like to do sort of a last call on the crufty ID (draft-ietf-newtrk-cruft-00.txt) I do not want to last call the document itself instead I'd like to last call the concept of this document so the specific details of the process proposed in the ID are off-topic but the idea of having a process to perform "the downgrading of old standards described in RFC 2026, as well as BCPs, without placing an unreasonable load on groups charged with performing other tasks in the IETF" is in-scope consider this question "should this working group develop process(es) with the aims described in the ID draft-ietf-newtrk-cruft-00.txt?" please answer with "yes" "no" or "maybe" please give a SHORT explanation of why for an answer of "yes" or "no" if you answer "maybe" please state why you cannot answer "yes" or "no" this sort-of-last-call will end in two weeks (Oct 26) at noon ET if there is no clear consensus (or a consensus for "maybe") we can talk about the question during the newtrk session in DC, if there is a clear consensus of "no" we will drop the idea, and if the clear consensus is "yes" we will then discuss the specifics of the proposal. thanks Scott . newtrk resources:_____________________________________________________ web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk.html mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk/index.html
- RE: [newtrk] a crufty last call Larry Masinter
- [newtrk] a crufty last call scott bradner
- Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call Eliot Lear
- RE: [newtrk] a crufty last call john.loughney
- RE: [newtrk] a crufty last call Lars-Erik Jonsson (LU/EAB)
- Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call Susan Harris
- Timing (Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call) Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- RE: [newtrk] a crufty last call Christian Huitema
- Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call Kurt D. Zeilenga
- Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call Paul Hoffman / VPNC
- Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call David Meyer
- Re: Timing (Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call Eliot Lear
- Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call Alex Rousskov
- Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call Pekka Savola
- Re: [newtrk] a crufty last call Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- RE: [newtrk] a crufty last call Larry Masinter
- RE: [newtrk] a crufty last call john.loughney
- RE: [newtrk] a crufty last call Pekka Savola