[newtrk] a crufty last call

sob@harvard.edu (scott bradner) Tue, 12 October 2004 17:55 UTC

Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu (root@darkwing.uoregon.edu [128.223.142.13]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA14223 for <newtrk-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:55:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9CHQkir020931; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i9CHQk1M020923; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from newdev.harvard.edu (newdev.eecs.harvard.edu [140.247.60.212]) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9CHQjs0020615 for <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:26:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by newdev.harvard.edu (Postfix, from userid 501) id 284C7DAA95; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:26:39 -0400 (EDT)
To: newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu
Subject: [newtrk] a crufty last call
Message-Id: <20041012172639.284C7DAA95@newdev.harvard.edu>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:26:39 -0400
From: sob@harvard.edu
Sender: owner-newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: sob@harvard.edu

I'd like to do sort of a last call on the crufty ID
(draft-ietf-newtrk-cruft-00.txt)

I do not want to last call the document itself instead I'd like to last 
call the concept of this document

so the specific details of the process proposed in the ID are off-topic 
but the idea of having a process to perform "the downgrading of old
standards described in RFC 2026, as well as BCPs, without placing
an unreasonable load on groups charged with performing other tasks in
the IETF" is in-scope

consider this question
	"should this working group develop process(es) with the aims
	 described in the ID draft-ietf-newtrk-cruft-00.txt?"

please answer with "yes" "no" or "maybe"

please give a SHORT explanation of why for an answer of "yes" or "no"

if you answer "maybe" please state why you cannot answer "yes" or "no"

this sort-of-last-call will end in two weeks (Oct 26) at noon ET

if there is no clear consensus (or a consensus for "maybe") we can talk
about the question during the newtrk session in DC, if there is a clear 
consensus of "no" we will drop the idea, and if the clear consensus 
is "yes" we will then discuss the specifics of the proposal.

thanks

Scott
.
newtrk resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk/index.html