IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic

<john.loughney@nokia.com> Wed, 13 July 2005 03:54 UTC

Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DsYKZ-0002Nl-LI for newtrk-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:54:45 -0400
Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu (root@darkwing.uoregon.edu [128.223.142.13]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA22945 for <newtrk-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:54:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6D3qxnY023138; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 20:52:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j6D3qwpW023137; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 20:52:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-ext04.nokia.com (mgw-ext04.nokia.com [131.228.20.96]) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6D3quvC023095 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 20:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from esebh107.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh107.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.143.143]) by mgw-ext04.nokia.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id j6D3lY6q026417; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 06:47:37 +0300
Received: from esebh101.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.177]) by esebh107.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 13 Jul 2005 06:52:44 +0300
Received: from esebe100.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.118]) by esebh101.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 13 Jul 2005 06:52:44 +0300
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: RE: [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 06:52:43 +0300
Message-ID: <1AA39B75171A7144A73216AED1D7478D6CE8FF@esebe100.NOE.Nokia.com>
Thread-Topic: [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic
Thread-Index: AcWG3OxqEu73BkwYREq0y4FrXtn28QAgVerg
From: john.loughney@nokia.com
To: hgs@cs.columbia.edu
Cc: newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jul 2005 03:52:44.0765 (UTC) FILETIME=[538248D0:01C5875E]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by darkwing.uoregon.edu id j6D3qwvB023103
Sender: owner-newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: john.loughney@nokia.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

I believe Eliot is planning on updating it.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Henning Schulzrinne [mailto:hgs@cs.columbia.edu]
> Sent: 12 July, 2005 15:26
> To: Loughney John (Nokia-NRC/Helsinki)
> Cc: brc@zurich.ibm.com; blilly@erols.com; newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu;
> ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic
> 
> 
> Yes, this seems pretty close to the IETF DPW. Unfortunately, 
> the draft 
> has expired (I saw the report on the experiment, but even that seems 
> rather preliminary, in that no actual action to HISTORIC has been 
> taken). Is there a plan to act on the recommendation of 
> draft-ietf-newtrk-cruft-00 in the foreseeable future?
> 
> > 
> > Have you seen draft-ietf-newtrk-cruft-00?  It proposes 
> something along
> > these lines.
> > 
> > John
> 
> 

.
newtrk resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk/index.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email