Re: [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic
Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 13 July 2005 08:24 UTC
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DscY5-0007mA-9B for newtrk-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 04:24:57 -0400
Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu (root@darkwing.uoregon.edu [128.223.142.13]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA14502 for <newtrk-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 04:24:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6D8NZuR022764; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 01:23:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j6D8NY7q022762; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 01:23:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com (sj-iport-5.cisco.com [171.68.10.87]) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6D8NXoP022711 for <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 01:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (171.68.223.137) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Jul 2005 01:23:29 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: i="3.93,285,1115017200"; d="scan'208"; a="197963457:sNHT29422144"
Received: from imail.cisco.com (imail.cisco.com [128.107.200.91]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j6D8NQ6p010619; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 01:23:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [212.254.247.3] (ams-clip-vpn-dhcp98.cisco.com [10.61.64.98]) by imail.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6D8M51Z028659; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 01:22:05 -0700
Message-ID: <42D4CF7B.1000306@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 10:23:23 +0200
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: john.loughney@nokia.com
CC: hgs@cs.columbia.edu, newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu
Subject: Re: [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic
References: <1AA39B75171A7144A73216AED1D7478D6CE8FF@esebe100.NOE.Nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <1AA39B75171A7144A73216AED1D7478D6CE8FF@esebe100.NOE.Nokia.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
IIM-SIG: v:"1.1"; h:"imail.cisco.com"; d:"cisco.com"; z:"home"; m:"krs"; t:"1121242927.50315"; x:"432200"; a:"rsa-sha1"; b:"nofws:1189"; e:"Iw=="; n:"sQYarK2E51MdcTiUqeif3F7cWdxIfoCiXhdfb9vD5ee/j0jXL15gbFxF2p" "XIweAblu0N6XAgK7k+wrbr7bQDJaCDqOmzqpRUBjIRQAXQ7NzadpmR3pUL6wxaRUtW+c43sl9jC" "50Qg1sXHpPjt8Y+Y16ioyQAQAdSunM4YhevURc="; s:"X4XstA09ePdV+LfVpk6pqctXggI+QS3eyysHS3GnNwdNekKGMXt2xZDu/yrVgT9Inh85wsSd" "yhfxtd5a+yXpZ7k6NkCDDEXiR5b4KBx0hnDXbhnAjyLbWYP2DwXlGF6g9Q637GwB8mQ4Z6/MCSi" "x9ByyOAWMXZKtM8SeHy8wrHs="; c:"Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 10:23:23 +0200"; c:"From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>"; c:"Subject: Re: [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic"
IIM-VERIFY: s:"y"; v:"y"; r:"60"; h:"imail.cisco.com"; c:"message from imail.cisco.com verified; "
Sender: owner-newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi, That document is now published as draft-lear-newtrk-decruft-experiment-00.txt. I did not use the same name because the document and its purpose has changed somewhat. We can decide whether to advance this doc at the meeting in Paris. I will make one additional update prior to the meeting. Eliot john.loughney@nokia.com wrote: > I believe Eliot is planning on updating it. > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: ext Henning Schulzrinne [mailto:hgs@cs.columbia.edu] >>Sent: 12 July, 2005 15:26 >>To: Loughney John (Nokia-NRC/Helsinki) >>Cc: brc@zurich.ibm.com; blilly@erols.com; newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu; >>ietf@ietf.org >>Subject: Re: [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic >> >> >>Yes, this seems pretty close to the IETF DPW. Unfortunately, >>the draft >>has expired (I saw the report on the experiment, but even that seems >>rather preliminary, in that no actual action to HISTORIC has been >>taken). Is there a plan to act on the recommendation of >>draft-ietf-newtrk-cruft-00 in the foreseeable future? >> >> >>>Have you seen draft-ietf-newtrk-cruft-00? It proposes >> >>something along >> >>>these lines. >>> >>>John >> >> > > . > newtrk resources:_____________________________________________________ > web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk.html > mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk/index.html > > . newtrk resources:_____________________________________________________ web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk.html mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk/index.html
- [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic john.loughney
- [newtrk] Re: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic Iljitsch van Beijnum
- [newtrk] Re: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic Eliot Lear
- [newtrk] RE: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic john.loughney
- [newtrk] RE: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic john.loughney
- Re: [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic Bruce Lilly
- Re: [newtrk] Re: Question about Obsoleted vs. His… Brian E Carpenter
- [newtrk] RE: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic John C Klensin
- [newtrk] Re: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic Ted Hardie
- Re: [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic Henning Schulzrinne
- [newtrk] Re: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic Bob Braden
- [newtrk] Re: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic Iljitsch van Beijnum
- [newtrk] RE: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic john.loughney
- RE: [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic john.loughney
- RE: [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic john.loughney
- [newtrk] RE: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic john.loughney
- [newtrk] RE: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic john.loughney
- RE: [newtrk] Re: Question about Obsoleted vs. His… john.loughney
- RE: [newtrk] Re: Question about Obsoleted vs. His… Larry Masinter
- Re: [newtrk] Re: Question about Obsoleted vs. His… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [newtrk] Re: Question about Obsoleted vs. His… Brian E Carpenter
- [newtrk] Re: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic C. M. Heard
- RE: [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic john.loughney
- Re: [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic Eliot Lear
- RE: [newtrk] Re: Question about Obsoleted vs. His… Bruce Lilly
- One-step standards process draft (was Re: [newtrk… Spencer Dawkins
- RE: [newtrk] Re: Question about Obsoleted vs. His… john.loughney
- RE: [newtrk] Re: Question about Obsoleted vs. His… Bruce Lilly