Re: [nfsv4] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8881 (6308)

[Magnus Westerlund <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

Then I will verify it. 

/Magnus

On Tue, 2020-10-20 at 15:20 +0000, Noveck, David wrote:
> Looks valid to me as well.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck Lever <[e-mail]> 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 10:53 AM
> To: Magnus Westerlund <[e-mail]>
> Cc: Noveck, David <[e-mail]>; David Noveck <
> [e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; 
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8881 (6308)
> 
> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open
> attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Magnus-
> 
> I asked Calum to file this for the WG to verify.
> It looks like a valid comment to me.
> 
> 
> > On Oct 20, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Magnus Westerlund <
> > [e-mail]> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Authors, can you please comment on this Errata. Appears a straight 
> > forward one to verify if it correct.
> > 
> > /Magnus
> > 
> > On Fri, 2020-10-16 at 15:00 -0700, RFC Errata System wrote:
> > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8881, "Network 
> > > File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 Protocol".
> > > 
> > > --------------------------------------
> > > You may review the report below and at:
> > > 
> > 
> > https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=ab0db258-f5ad0836-ab0df2c3-86b18
> > 86cfa64-24ef43ab44e776da&q=1&e=84f54505-cd2c-40e6-a5e7-27c22813adc1&u=
> > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Ferrata%2Feid6308
> > > 
> > > --------------------------------------
> > > Type: Technical
> > > Reported by: Calum Mackay <[e-mail]>
> > > 
> > > Section: 18.32.3
> > > 
> > > Original Text
> > > -------------
> > >   *  The server MUST commit the data at a level at least as high as
> > >      that committed.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Corrected Text
> > > --------------
> > >   *  The server MUST commit the data at a level at least as high as
> > >      that requested.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Notes
> > > -----
> > > The meaning is probably obvious, but perhaps a MUST ought to be 
> > > unambiguous?
> > > 
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > editorial: also, the point above this one uses the word "stronger"
> > > where this point uses "high", both for the stability level.
> > > 
> > > The two lines should probably use the same word.
> > > 
> > > Instructions:
> > > -------------
> > > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please 
> > > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. 
> > > When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change 
> > > the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> > > 
> > > --------------------------------------
> > > RFC8881 (draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns-04)
> > > --------------------------------------
> > > Title               : Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1
> > > Protocol
> > > Publication Date    : August 2020
> > > Author(s)           : D. Noveck, Ed., C. Lever
> > > Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> > > Source              : Network File System Version 4
> > > Area                : Transport
> > > Stream              : IETF
> > > Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> --
> Chuck Lever
> 
> 
>