IETF Logo Mail Archive

[nfsv4] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8881 (6308)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 16 October 2020 22:01 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C0E93A0B82 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 15:01:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ty6zuSdUHV8a for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 15:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86C3B3A0B7B for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 15:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id E1E04F406F4; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 15:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
To: dnoveck@netapp.com, chuck.lever@oracle.com, martin.h.duke@gmail.com, magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com, beepee@gmail.com, davenoveck@gmail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: calum.mackay@oracle.com, nfsv4@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20201016220055.E1E04F406F4@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 15:00:55 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/YwllfIA0Sbyl0JlE6wuU2tOPXjE>
Subject: [nfsv4] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8881 (6308)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 22:01:19 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8881,
"Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 Protocol".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6308

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Calum Mackay <calum.mackay@oracle.com>

Section: 18.32.3

Original Text
-------------
   *  The server MUST commit the data at a level at least as high as
      that committed.


Corrected Text
--------------
   *  The server MUST commit the data at a level at least as high as
      that requested.


Notes
-----
The meaning is probably obvious, but perhaps a MUST ought
to be unambiguous?

---

editorial: also, the point above this one uses the word "stronger"
where this point uses "high", both for the stability level.

The two lines should probably use the same word.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC8881 (draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns-04)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 Protocol
Publication Date    : August 2020
Author(s)           : D. Noveck, Ed., C. Lever
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Network File System Version 4
Area                : Transport
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email