RE: [NSIS] Draft on NSIS Operation Over IP Tunnels

Hi Charles,

Thanks for the draft, I think this is quite a useful analysis.  As tunneling,
like multihoming, can be related to mobility, I wonder if the analysis could
go into the Mobility Applicability Statement document.  

After that, for the BOUND_FLOW_SESSION object, do you think that this would
be a general object for all NSLPs that might run over a tunnel?  One option
would be to add this to the existing NSLPs, or to write a very short document
registering this as a NSLP object in the NSIS IANA registry (when there is one).

What does the rest of the wg think?

thanks,
John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsis-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:nsis-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf Of
> ext Charles Shen
> Sent: 14 July, 2005 07:45
> To: nsis@ietf.org
> Subject: [NSIS] Draft on NSIS Operation Over IP Tunnels
> 
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> We've submitted a draft on "NSIS Operation Over IP Tunnels". 
> The abstract is
> as follows:
> 
>    In this draft we briefly review various IP Tunnelling 
> mechanisms and
>    discuss the main problems with signaling operation over IP tunnels.
>    We also summarize the existing RSVP operation over IP tunnels
>    mechanism.  Then we present the design details and case examples of
>    an NSIS operation over IP tunnels scheme.  QoS NSLP is 
> assumed as the
>    NSIS signaling application in our discussion.
> 
> The document is available at
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-shen-nsis-tunnel-00.txt
> 
> Any comments are greatly appreciated!
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Charles 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nsis mailing list
> nsis@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis
> 

_______________________________________________
nsis mailing list
nsis@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis