IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ntpwg] Solicit comments for draft-wu-ntp-ntp-cfg-00

Harlan Stenn <stenn@ntp.org> Thu, 23 July 2015 03:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A6AE1A8F3F for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 20:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x8gJuLxY5dck for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 20:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B6081A8F38 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 20:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD6986DBB8 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 03:13:45 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Received: from stenn.ntp.org (stenn.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::30]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1ABE86D60E for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 02:51:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost.ntp.org ([::1] helo=stenn.ntp.org) by stenn.ntp.org with esmtp (Exim 4.85 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <stenn@stenn.ntp.org>) id 1ZI6b4-0006qY-LN; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 02:50:58 +0000
From: Harlan Stenn <stenn@ntp.org>
To: "Wunan (Eric)" <eric.wu@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <0F26584357FD124DB93F1535E4B0A6505FC159E8@szxema508-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <0F26584357FD124DB93F1535E4B0A6505FC141B2@szxema508-mbx.china.huawei.com>, <55AFE233.4000407@pdmconsulting.net> <0F26584357FD124DB93F1535E4B0A6505FC159E8@szxema508-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Wunan (Eric)" <eric.wu@huawei.com> message dated "Wed, 22 Jul 2015 22:38:46 +0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 7.4.2; nmh 1.6; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 24)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 1.8)
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 02:50:58 +0000
Message-Id: <E1ZI6b4-0006qY-LN@stenn.ntp.org>
Subject: Re: [ntpwg] Solicit comments for draft-wu-ntp-ntp-cfg-00
X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol <ntpwg.lists.ntp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/options/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: "ntpwg@lists.ntp.org" <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>, "mayer@pdmconsulting.net" <mayer@pdmconsulting.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org
Sender: ntpwg <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>

Eric,

On the one hand, if somebody isn't going to implement mode 6 if they go
to the trouble to implement their own version of NTP, and they're not
going to use the wildly portable reference implementation from NTF, why
would they decide to implement the Yang model instead?

But I do see value in common management tools, since we already have
SNMP support as well.

Has your proposal been implemented yet?

H
_______________________________________________
ntpwg mailing list
ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email