IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ntpwg] Solicit comments for draft-wu-ntp-ntp-cfg-00

Danny Mayer <mayer@pdmconsulting.net> Wed, 22 July 2015 19:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38BE21A1EF6 for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a0PHAHk3v8b1 for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC691A8789 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7FC86DBC3 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 19:00:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD8686DB08 for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 18:32:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from chessie.everett.org ([2001:470:1:205::234]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <mayer@pdmconsulting.net>) id 1ZHyoZ-000LTX-3e for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 18:32:29 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chessie.everett.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B79EBB82B for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 18:32:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.2.64.177] (unknown [198.22.153.36]) by chessie.everett.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A40BB814; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 18:32:21 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <55AFE233.4000407@pdmconsulting.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 14:34:27 -0400
From: Danny Mayer <mayer@pdmconsulting.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Wunan (Eric)" <eric.wu@huawei.com>, "ntpwg@lists.ntp.org" <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
References: <0F26584357FD124DB93F1535E4B0A6505FC141B2@szxema508-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <0F26584357FD124DB93F1535E4B0A6505FC141B2@szxema508-mbx.china.huawei.com>
X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
X-DSPAM-Processed: Wed Jul 22 18:32:22 2015
X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9899
X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000
X-DSPAM-Signature: 6384,55afe1b6829934616748710
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:470:1:205::234
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mayer@pdmconsulting.net
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org)
Subject: Re: [ntpwg] Solicit comments for draft-wu-ntp-ntp-cfg-00
X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol <ntpwg.lists.ntp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/options/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: mayer@pdmconsulting.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org
Sender: ntpwg <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>

Frankly I have never understood the point of this draft. It seems to
have been introduced in a vacuum. ntpq on the reference implementation
already handles everything needed and uses ntp mode 6 packets. Is there
something I didn't understand?

Danny

On 7/21/2015 5:13 AM, Wunan (Eric) wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> 
>  
> 
> I noticed there is one draft related to NTP presented in RTGWG at Prague
> IETF93.
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model/
> 
>  
> 
> It seems the co-authors of this draft wishing to augment and define NTP
> YANG model in their next version.
> 
> Frankly speaking, if NTP YANG is going to be defined, I think it will be
> more reasonable to define it in NTPWG, since all NTP experts are here,
> what is more, NTP MIB is also define here.
> 
> To do that, I abosutely need the help from this working group.
> 
> Please help us if you guys think this makes sense.
> 
>  
> 
> Thank you.
> 
>  
> 
> Regards
> 
> Eric
> 
>  
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>  [ntpwg] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-wu-ntp-ntp-cfg-00.txt
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>   * /From/: "Wunan (Eric)" <eric.wu at huawei.com
>     <mailto:eric.wu@DOMAIN.HIDDEN>>
>   * /To/: "ntpwg at lists.ntp.org <mailto:ntpwg@DOMAIN.HIDDEN>" <ntpwg
>     at lists.ntp.org <mailto:ntpwg@DOMAIN.HIDDEN>>, "odonoghue at
>     isoc.org <mailto:odonoghue@DOMAIN.HIDDEN>" <odonoghue at isoc.org
>     <mailto:odonoghue@DOMAIN.HIDDEN>>
>   * /Cc/: "Anil Kumar S N \(VRP Network BL\)" <anil.sn at huawei.com
>     <mailto:anil.sn@DOMAIN.HIDDEN>>
>   * /Date/: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 07:49:57 +0000 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> We have submitted a draft on YANG data model for NTP. Through this
> draft we hope the NTP YANG discussion may be introduced
in NTPWG since we believe it is a good time to start to do it now.
> Since this draft is the only individual one in NTPWG, I may want to
ask the chair whether it is the proper place to do it, after all YANG
data model is not in current charter.
> Wish this mail can reach the chair:)
> 
> And we would like to know if there are people interested in this
> work,
IMHO, maybe one design team can be used to promote NTP's YANG data model.
> Anyway, any discussion and comments are welcomed.>
> Regards
> Eric & Anil
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ntpwg mailing list
> ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
> http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg
> 


_______________________________________________
ntpwg mailing list
ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email