IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ntpwg] Solicit comments for draft-wu-ntp-ntp-cfg-00

"Wunan (Eric)" <eric.wu@huawei.com> Thu, 23 July 2015 08:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD571A8A1A for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 01:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.459
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.459 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e0hZ6MKkrMXF for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 01:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807F81A90B3 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 01:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AED986DB65 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 08:48:30 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C5C86D48C for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 08:23:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.65]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <eric.wu@huawei.com>) id 1ZIBmF-000FuA-Ht; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 08:23:00 +0000
Received: from 172.24.1.50 (EHLO SZXEMA413-HUB.china.huawei.com) ([172.24.1.50]) by szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CPE68995; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 16:22:38 +0800 (CST)
Received: from SZXEMA508-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.70]) by SZXEMA413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.72]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 16:22:35 +0800
From: "Wunan (Eric)" <eric.wu@huawei.com>
To: Harlan Stenn <stenn@ntp.org>
Thread-Topic: [ntpwg] Solicit comments for draft-wu-ntp-ntp-cfg-00
Thread-Index: AdDDlCK/cOxtnDmRStm+DecVDL66pAA1dkeAABit8F///8VKAIAA3qrY
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 08:22:34 +0000
Message-ID: <0F26584357FD124DB93F1535E4B0A6505FC16AFA@szxema508-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <0F26584357FD124DB93F1535E4B0A6505FC141B2@szxema508-mbx.china.huawei.com>, <55AFE233.4000407@pdmconsulting.net> <0F26584357FD124DB93F1535E4B0A6505FC159E8@szxema508-mbx.china.huawei.com>, <E1ZI6b4-0006qY-LN@stenn.ntp.org>
In-Reply-To: <E1ZI6b4-0006qY-LN@stenn.ntp.org>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.45.3.31]
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 119.145.14.65
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org, stenn@ntp.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: eric.wu@huawei.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org)
Subject: Re: [ntpwg] Solicit comments for draft-wu-ntp-ntp-cfg-00
X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol <ntpwg.lists.ntp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/options/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: "ntpwg@lists.ntp.org" <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>, "mayer@pdmconsulting.net" <mayer@pdmconsulting.net>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6086503573068013928=="
Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org
Sender: ntpwg <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>

Harlan,

I didn't mean to offense people on mode 6 importance, of couse mode6 has its own value.
What I meant is that it will be better to have another tool in the toolbox, since one more choice available.



And to be honest, usually we use SNMP&MIB to monitor status instead of deloying and configuring. Especially when you face a network with 2000 nodes which need to enable ntp.



We did implement this NTP YANG in our central controller, it will be encoded in SouthBound Interface transport protocol and decoded at router-systems or devices.



Regards

Eric




________________________________________
发件人: Harlan Stenn [stenn@ntp.org]
发送时间: 2015年7月23日 10:50
收件人: Wunan (Eric)
抄送: mayer@pdmconsulting.net; ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
主题: Re: [ntpwg] Solicit comments for draft-wu-ntp-ntp-cfg-00

Eric,

On the one hand, if somebody isn't going to implement mode 6 if they go
to the trouble to implement their own version of NTP, and they're not
going to use the wildly portable reference implementation from NTF, why
would they decide to implement the Yang model instead?

But I do see value in common management tools, since we already have
SNMP support as well.

Has your proposal been implemented yet?

H

_______________________________________________
ntpwg mailing list
ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email