IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] WGLC: draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps

Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> Wed, 05 December 2018 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <mlichvar@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A309E126CB6 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 07:47:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wbB1F2i40vjR for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 07:47:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB035130E18 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 07:47:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33D9CA403F for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 15:47:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (holly.tpb.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com [10.43.134.11]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A71665D756 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 15:47:15 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 16:47:01 +0100
From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
To: ntp@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20181205154701.GB28938@localhost>
References: <FBA3AD47-141A-4CD5-8808-D5FE6BE2374B@isoc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <FBA3AD47-141A-4CD5-8808-D5FE6BE2374B@isoc.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Wed, 05 Dec 2018 15:47:16 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/frET2TItPEB1091d59nBJf9XU_s>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] WGLC: draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 15:47:21 -0000

On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 07:52:59AM +0000, Karen O'Donoghue wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> This message initiates a three plus week working group last call for:
> 
> Guidelines for Defining Packet Timestamps
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps
> 
> Please review the referenced document and send any comments to the mailing list including your assessment of whether this document is mature enough to proceed to the IESG. Please note that these messages of support for progression to the mailing list will be used to determine WG consensus to proceed..

I had few comments for this draft before, which are not addressed
in the current version (-04) of the document yet, but Tal has proposed
some changes and I'm happy with them. As soon as they are in, I
support advancing this document.

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email