Re: [Ntp] WGLC: draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps

Hi Denis,

Many thanks for your comments.

Good catch - will fix the broken xref.
Regarding the reference that points to the previous version of the draft -
this is an issue we are aware of, and we will work it out with the RFC
editor before publication, so that the xref will point to the RFC number of
the current document.

Cheers,
Tal.

On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 6:13 PM Denis Reilly <denis.reilly@orolia.com> wrote:

> Hello!
>
>
>
> I have read the NTP Packet timestamps draft and believe it is ready for
> submission, subject to my one minor nit, below:
>
>
>
> In Section 6.1 and 6.2, the draft references an earlier version of itself
> (draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps-03) as an informative reference.
> Shouldn’t it just refer directly to itself as a section link?
>
>
>
> In particular, Section 2 reads:
>
>       The timestamp format used in this specification is the PTP
>
>       [IEEE1588] Truncated format, as specified in Section 4.2.3 of
>
>       [I-D.ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps].
>
>
>
> However, Section 4.2.3 doesn’t exist, either in this draft or in the
> referenced -03 draft. This reference should be corrected.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> --
>
> Denis Reilly  |  Technical Lead  |  denis.reilly@orolia.com  (585)321-5837
> <(585)%20321-5837>
>
>
>
> *From:* ntp <ntp-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of * Karen O'Donoghue
> *Sent:* Friday, November 30, 2018 3:38 PM
> *To:* ntp@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Ntp] WGLC: draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps
>
>
>
> Folks,
>
>
>
> After receiving a few requests, I am going to extend this WGLC for one
> week. Please submit comments by COB on Friday 7 December. Even if you don’t
> have any comments, please indicate to the mailing list that you have read
> the draft and you believe it is ready for submission to the IESG. This is
> critical to helping the chairs determine working group consensus on this
> document.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Karen
>
>
>
> On Nov 6, 2018, at 2:52 AM, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> Folks,
>
>
>
> This message initiates a three plus week working group last call for:
>
>
>
> Guidelines for Defining Packet Timestamps
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps
>
>
>
> Please review the referenced document and send any comments to the mailing
> list including your assessment of whether this document is mature enough
> to proceed to the IESG. Please note that these messages of support for
> progression to the mailing list will be used to determine WG consensus to
> proceed.
>
> Please send all comments in by COB on Friday 30 November. I realize this
> is a bit longer than normal but we are coming out of an IETF week and
> heading into the Thanksgiving holiday in the US.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Karen and Dieter
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open
> attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. *
> _______________________________________________
> ntp mailing list
> ntp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp
>