IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] WGLC: draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps

Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Wed, 19 December 2018 18:13 UTC

Return-Path: <wlosh@bsdimp.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F7F130E8D for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 10:13:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DB_hvBdYNrQ9 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 10:13:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x831.google.com (mail-qt1-x831.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::831]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 742A6130E88 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 10:13:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x831.google.com with SMTP id p17so23265817qtl.5 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 10:13:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hiD+dgQ+I97YbuDrF/QEUL0vYycdO2umVir6IIZ2K/8=; b=WlmcEcWRmsvIfMwNS+UIpio54iyR6ELLHPfUeUqWLMBfGLHKuIBF2JzzRAEoXobQlc WIuP3jAPt7GDgjQRv/NZRMApLZc+RyBPV2kno0Xd7o1SKF6jB2J9phSQAqGwO4bYkY9M Q3Q4ziEsuaz0rNqQ/zFMHaCO9QlJ3L5sjoteUnHWXk7TIkHbCn5YSd3HkvLXDZ6s+wux qrCQCm6MZkNMlbOR4mP9qt9/L7nOnDmexvplK0Vnoap6uEpzFg/7hmCcmUDjlACyGoqB K1CSnkyanLoV2gfzXbGlaPX+dXLiBbYZLHf9WYxYy7dTmVeGzU+5ycmcUDGU3JsUS0UF FKeQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hiD+dgQ+I97YbuDrF/QEUL0vYycdO2umVir6IIZ2K/8=; b=PTbttfaB1Z+aAULweJi6eWNpDw9snX9JJbusHx/U0jplLmBoR7SS+aheDddRLI+RMS zrVJOkFQ7duOBk36LTwvD70uqpiJSeBdE403w11YhFxLzg3aRDfRmI5J/bDZxeuRvbax FvPhDYU9QLHnCteUTLh6s1pPrcs7ed1eyiQVJhenGQTaz5CWeK8rf9/4eINzDRIa+aL+ tOQ09nF1XDlMN6QWtuxoxbapQX1XoZX7BLJ13+l+3nl5tXXNSSRBU5S6zU807vtvycbp dLehBHnCMLawXSmidhJdLogMQdD4PhE0YzIt8mcQfUgdw8mECDVimHJqnbORQ0YJ4wzS cFoQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWaxlBYgAmFYvQ/sa2jg3q0If18+yK59EoamZfKwItW7fSo3xe9W 4QJ2f4AXh51tDU9B7NnAjfwcX4TLYtMrqIkAmFa2D/v8
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VG4SXoojjRacaZv5dyna6yp7nCip7hKpLCIhPamUFvpPSiUZVg6MHkR7C6WJkX6VczyRNeCS5zfPRq+M2ysLE=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:42c1:: with SMTP id g1mr23332854qtm.118.1545243187312; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 10:13:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <FBA3AD47-141A-4CD5-8808-D5FE6BE2374B@isoc.org> <F63DBDE9-B955-409D-ABC7-A6241C93CBA5@isoc.org> <CABUE3XktsYRm03xR2JjnTw-YYK1D3=+0bSuiyPubuJOpSOfSrw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABUE3XktsYRm03xR2JjnTw-YYK1D3=+0bSuiyPubuJOpSOfSrw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 11:12:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CANCZdfp2mjOcpW3q_QgPCdF1D0AYYTe7fmk3z4sBA_ROGRYTjg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tal Mizrahi <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com>
Cc: Karen ODonoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>, ntp@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000045b871057d63f785"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/lwxwFjRfEfo4AcC6JaESFyy5mVs>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] WGLC: draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 18:13:10 -0000

Hi,

Version 5 has addressed my concerns in prior drafts. Re-reading it now I
have no further issues and believe it's ready for publication.

Warner

On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 1:38 AM Tal Mizrahi <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> As WGLC has completed, we have uploaded an updated version of the draft:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps-05
>
> We believe this version addresses all the comments we received, including
> the latest comments from Miroslav, Warner, and Denis.
> Specifically, the authors had some offline correspondence with Miroslav
> and Warner regarding the leap second description and the NTP timestamp
> epoch description. After a few iterations we believe we have reached a
> satisfactory version of the relevant text. The changes compared to draft 04
> can be viewed in the diff version (
> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps-05.txt
> ).
>
> Cheers,
> Tal, Joachim, and Al.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:37 PM Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> After receiving a few requests, I am going to extend this WGLC for one
>> week. Please submit comments by COB on Friday 7 December. Even if you don’t
>> have any comments, please indicate to the mailing list that you have read
>> the draft and you believe it is ready for submission to the IESG. This is
>> critical to helping the chairs determine working group consensus on this
>> document.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Karen
>>
>> On Nov 6, 2018, at 2:52 AM, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org> wrote:
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> This message initiates a three plus week working group last call for:
>>
>> Guidelines for Defining Packet Timestamps
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps
>>
>> Please review the referenced document and send any comments to the
>> mailing list including your assessment of whether this document is mature
>> enough to proceed to the IESG. Please note that these messages of support
>> for progression to the mailing list will be used to determine WG consensus
>> to proceed.
>>
>> Please send all comments in by COB on Friday 30 November. I realize this
>> is a bit longer than normal but we are coming out of an IETF week and
>> heading into the Thanksgiving holiday in the US.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Karen and Dieter
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ntp mailing list
>> ntp@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp
>>
> _______________________________________________
> ntp mailing list
> ntp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email