IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Public NTP servers already responds to NTPv5

Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> Wed, 02 December 2020 08:43 UTC

Return-Path: <kurt@roeckx.be>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64303A09D3 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 00:43:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ur9I1BMknDIe for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 00:43:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from excelsior.roeckx.be (excelsior.roeckx.be [195.234.45.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 895693A09D4 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 00:43:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from intrepid.roeckx.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by excelsior.roeckx.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678ADA8A00E4; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 08:43:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by intrepid.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AB1E81FE0DDF; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 09:43:21 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 09:43:21 +0100
From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
To: Danny Mayer <mayer@ntp.org>
Cc: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>, ntp@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20201202084321.GT971977@roeckx.be>
References: <20201201214534.AABF440605C@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net> <6c93ddee-2089-98e8-9099-cb083d083da0@ntp.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6c93ddee-2089-98e8-9099-cb083d083da0@ntp.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/griYgv2gVKKMx0VAQUhcALddGEU>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Public NTP servers already responds to NTPv5
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 08:43:29 -0000

On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 07:06:47PM -0500, Danny Mayer wrote:
> It's essential that any NTPv5 document deal with interoperability with NTPv4
> clients and servers. NTPv5 will fail without it.

The only suggestion I have for that currently is do with TLS 1.3
did and have an extension with the version number in it, and still
have version 4 in the header.


Kurt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email