IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] Public NTP servers already responds to NTPv5

Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> Thu, 10 December 2020 01:06 UTC

Return-Path: <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 855F73A09E9 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 17:06:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.145
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.145 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.999, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=1.951, PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP=0.001, PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT=0.11, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 45yimULUMqlz for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 17:06:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net [64.139.1.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F091E3A0811 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 17:06:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shuksan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C972740605C; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 17:06:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3
To: Philip Prindeville <philipp@redfish-solutions.com>
cc: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>, Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>, NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>, hmurray@megapathdsl.net
From: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
In-Reply-To: Message from Philip Prindeville <philipp@redfish-solutions.com> of "Wed, 09 Dec 2020 17:39:25 MST." <58DBF4D0-BBEF-4F2E-8387-2FD0663FAD79@redfish-solutions.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 17:06:40 -0800
Message-Id: <20201210010640.C972740605C@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/nNcK9N7nDXzqrAAcC1GrHIRzJIg>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Public NTP servers already responds to NTPv5
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 01:06:48 -0000

> I’m missing the distinction in the difference between “no” an “I don’t know
> what you are talking about”.

> If you don’t know what I’m talking about, then you probably don’t. 

"no" means that I do understand what you asked about and the answer is "no".


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email