[Ntp] Antw: Re: Antwort: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Temperature Compensation for NTP?
Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> Wed, 09 December 2020 13:45 UTC
Return-Path: <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 861B53A1672 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 05:45:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ePtYHrgpU9OR for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 05:45:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx3.uni-regensburg.de (mx3.uni-regensburg.de [194.94.157.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B43FA3A166E for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 05:45:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx3.uni-regensburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 00B056000054 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 14:45:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de (gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de [132.199.5.51]) by mx3.uni-regensburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03429600004A for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 14:45:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from uni-regensburg-smtp1-MTA by gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 14:45:25 +0100
Message-Id: <5FD0D4F3020000A10003D6D1@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 18.3.0
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 14:45:23 +0100
From: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
To: "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>, magnus@rubidium.se
References: <06a3f575-0f32-8686-40c4-e948e619527e@thalesgroup.com> <5FCF48F1020000A10003D5E1@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de> <F8A667ED0200007A43047E14@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de> <5FD07720020000A10003D684@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de> <OFC100EA2B.0D5BBA74-ONC1258639.00422784-C1258639.00425388@ptb.de> <db435749-0a2d-63a9-777e-2657c7b99eed@rubidium.se>
In-Reply-To: <db435749-0a2d-63a9-777e-2657c7b99eed@rubidium.se>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/rtpezsfh6zL2h1toTwBt3mUo8v4>
Subject: [Ntp] Antw: Re: Antwort: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Temperature Compensation for NTP?
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 13:45:34 -0000
>>> Magnus Danielson <magnus@rubidium.se> schrieb am 09.12.2020 um 14:25 in Nachricht <db435749-0a2d-63a9-777e-2657c7b99eed@rubidium.se>: > Hi, > > In a similar notion, I do not see temperature compensations to be > anything but local clock maintenance. This can be done in so many ways > that I do not think it will be useful to clutter core mechanism > descriptions with it. There can be hardward compensations already in the > use of temperature compensated oscillators (TCXO) or oven stablized > oscillators (OCXO) or even atomic reference based. You can also do > software based compensation from trivial simple to advanced self-tuning. > That would still not relate to the core mechanisms of NTP. You may > benefit from feeling the correct time from NTP as you do such training, > but just like the oscillator offset file, it's a local issue, until it > isn't because it failed, and I've seen such cases with NTPv4. OK, convinced ;-) > > What we can do is to refactor the lockin mechanisms, because it can be > made more robust and also overcome problems with incorrect offset files, > that may rended intermediary nodes and client nodes problematic. That > would still not be part of the core protocol, but may be relevant as a > side protocol. > > Cheers, > Magnus > > On 2020-12-09 13:04, kristof.teichel@ptb.de wrote: >> I agree with the faction who believes that things like temperature >> correction should be outside of a document whose main focus is the >> on-wire protocol part of NTP (be it version 4 or 5) >> >> I would also prefer it if the on-wire protocol and any algorithms >> deriving offset/correction data from it would be split into different >> documents, with potentially a third one for the actual techniques used >> for clock disciplining. >> This would mean quite a lot of work in the short term, such as >> defining interfaces for what the single modules need from one another. >> But I think the clarification would be worth it (for example, it would >> create a place where integrating temperature corrections makes sense). >> >> >> Best regards, >> Kristof >> >> >> -----"ntp" <ntp-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:ntp-bounces@ietf.org>> >> schrieb: ----- >> An: "ntp@ietf.org <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>" <ntp@ietf.org >> <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>> >> Von: "FUSTE Emmanuel" >> Gesendet von: "ntp" >> Datum: 09.12.2020 10:55 >> Betreff: Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Temperature Compensation for NTP? >> >> Le 09/12/2020 à 08:05, Ulrich Windl a écrit : >> > >> > As said before, I think describing the protocol without the >> algorithms and clock model behind does not make sense, and when >> describing the clock model, one has to explain where clock wander and >> error estimate mainly comes from. >> > Also one of the design goals of NTP has been to provide "reasonalbe" >> time and error estimate even when there are no servers available and >> to lengthen the polling interval. I think considering the temperature >> (optionally), can help improving those capabilities, so why ignore? >> > >> Because improving capabilities of the oscillator is not the NTP job. NTP >> algorithm is a consumer of those capabilities, we should have way to >> provide these capabilities to the NTP algorithm but it is not the job of >> NTP to interfere with them. >> Chrony implement poor man temperature compensation, great. But if I use >> TCXO or OCXO considering the temperature (and which one ?) is non sense. >> And I could even implement this basic crystal TC in a kernel driver for >> better integration with the timekeeping machinery and interface for the >> same result, NTP is completely out of the picture. >> If I know the aging curve I could implement it too in this same driver >> or in chrony to better free running precision. >> An oscillator could characterized by stability temp stability in ppm/c, >> Alan variance, phase noise, aging curve and more. >> For sure, only a metrology lab or the oscillator maker could give you >> the characteristics of an oscillator and on most hardware and computers, >> the oscillator spec are not provided or know. >> NTP appliance provider job is to use such advanced oscillators and >> compensation technique to provide better global characteristics and be >> better clock source for serving NTP. >> The job of NTP is to steer the system clock and so possibly the >> underlying oscillator in one way and to provide measurements in the >> other way. >> So the only question is : what property/characteristics/metric of the >> underlying oscillator/clock the NTP servo/clock model need to do its job >> better rather than default values ? >> With the modern granularity and precision of measurements thanks to HW >> time stamping availability and oscillators quality, the spectrum of >> possibility is too wide for hard coded good for all default values. >> >> Regards, >> Emmanuel. >> _______________________________________________ >> ntp mailing list >> ntp@ietf.org <mailto:ntp@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp >> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ntp mailing list >> ntp@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp
- [Ntp] Temperature Compensation for NTP? Ulrich Windl
- Re: [Ntp] Temperature Compensation for NTP? Miroslav Lichvar
- Re: [Ntp] Temperature Compensation for NTP? Hal Murray
- Re: [Ntp] Temperature Compensation for NTP? Kurt Roeckx
- [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Temperature Compensation fo… Ulrich Windl
- Re: [Ntp] Temperature Compensation for NTP? Philip Prindeville
- Re: [Ntp] Temperature Compensation for NTP? Hal Murray
- Re: [Ntp] Temperature Compensation for NTP? Harlan Stenn
- Re: [Ntp] Temperature Compensation for NTP? Kurt Roeckx
- Re: [Ntp] Temperature Compensation for NTP? Hal Murray
- [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Temperature Compensation fo… Ulrich Windl
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Temperature Compensatio… FUSTE Emmanuel
- [Ntp] Antwort: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Temperature Co… kristof.teichel
- Re: [Ntp] Antwort: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Temperatur… Magnus Danielson
- [Ntp] Antw: Re: Antwort: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Temp… Ulrich Windl
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: Re: Antwort: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: … Magnus Danielson
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: Re: Antwort: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: … Warner Losh
- Re: [Ntp] Temperature Compensation for NTP? Kurt Roeckx
- Re: [Ntp] Antwort: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Temperatur… Philip Prindeville
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: Re: Antwort: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: … Magnus Danielson
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: Re: Antwort: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: … Martin Burnicki
- [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Temperature Compensation fo… Ulrich Windl
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Temperature Compensatio… Magnus Danielson
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Temperature Compensatio… Kurt Roeckx
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Temperature Compensatio… Ulrich Windl