Re: [Ntp] Temperature Compensation for NTP?

Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> Tue, 08 December 2020 21:44 UTC

Return-Path: <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D5903A1199 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:44:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.146
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.146 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.999, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=1.951, PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP=0.001, PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT=0.11, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3HTJQ_PQ5cvT for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:44:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net [64.139.1.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A213A0FC0 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:44:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shuksan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE92B40605C; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:44:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3
To: Philip Prindeville <philipp@redfish-solutions.com>
cc: "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>, hmurray@megapathdsl.net
From: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
In-Reply-To: Message from Philip Prindeville <philipp@redfish-solutions.com> of "Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:29:14 MST." <D0794DE6-78A1-4E64-841F-865B5354EA8C@redfish-solutions.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 13:44:21 -0800
Message-Id: <20201208214421.CE92B40605C@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/y8R6lT6vbqZkCP5UWbhSAebT5ss>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Temperature Compensation for NTP?
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 21:44:27 -0000

philipp@redfish-solutions.com said:
> Given we have better understanding now of the thermal stability of solid
> state (crystal) oscillators, why not include that into the algorithm if we’re
> going to flesh it out specifically? 

I think the algorithm(s) should be split out to a separate document, if any.



-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.