Re: [OAUTH-WG] Security area review

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Mon, 08 August 2011 03:28 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A92521F8862 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 20:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.05
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.05 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.073, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nlOS7LvvYhi1 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 20:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yi0-f44.google.com (mail-yi0-f44.google.com [209.85.218.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B1321F8849 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 20:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yie12 with SMTP id 12so1002181yie.31 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 07 Aug 2011 20:28:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=R9jt4gj+tdTjx2cew00LexhFnn5TX2rIG3Vd0xvF1gk=; b=Nik012iUnLmzSj3JQAT+pXrjqZN7F62ClkdGtE7poBkajvVvtAekURfdY6vDT2YXdf PzGeJzosXbg5Gq74rcBeHFbAwiNDUcdJfOrd3dfp+L7dVn5xWufBBnwOffYp0vKwdZo0 IxK5lZmM70yZNAissGt3yDmtyqj1VWWOqljY8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.146.36.16 with SMTP id j16mr723017yaj.8.1312774110177; Sun, 07 Aug 2011 20:28:30 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.147.38.7 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 20:28:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72345024864A96@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
References: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72345024864A96@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2011 23:28:30 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: n2fz-dlBJ2KimXSThVzmH6ODLP4
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVBV-Pcv9NL_aHPFvU5s9f=W0-Hzuh3tAXD3TGf+j6nbXw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Security area review
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 03:28:06 -0000

> Did the chairs issue a last call request to anyone in the security area? I
> thought the whole point of moving this working group from apps to security
> was to increase the review and participation of that area. So far I have
> seen absolutely nothing to indicate any such contribution. I would like to
> know what actual actions are being taken to turn this promise into reality.

There'll be a security directorate review when we send the doc to the
IESG.  I can certainly ask Sam to schedule a review now, instead of
waiting, and I'll do that.

Barry, as chair