Re: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession

"Manger, James" <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com> Mon, 14 December 2015 04:03 UTC

Return-Path: <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004CE1A88E4 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 20:03:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_AU=0.377, HOST_EQ_AU=0.327, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RELAY_IS_203=0.994] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w_NZMm6TFRpY for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 20:03:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ipxbvo.tcif.telstra.com.au (ipxbvo.tcif.telstra.com.au [203.35.135.204]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02411A8890 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 20:03:47 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.20,425,1444654800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="46853766"
Received: from unknown (HELO ipcbvi.tcif.telstra.com.au) ([10.97.217.204]) by ipobvi.tcif.telstra.com.au with ESMTP; 14 Dec 2015 15:03:45 +1100
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5700,7163,8014"; a="69948046"
Received: from wsmsg3755.srv.dir.telstra.com ([172.49.40.196]) by ipcbvi.tcif.telstra.com.au with ESMTP; 14 Dec 2015 15:03:45 +1100
Received: from WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com ([172.49.40.159]) by WSMSG3755.srv.dir.telstra.com ([172.49.40.196]) with mapi; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:03:45 +1100
From: "Manger, James" <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com>
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:03:44 +1100
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession
Thread-Index: AQHRNh1yckJg5FSS3k+scclzNoZqUp7J0+DAgAAFEQA=
Message-ID: <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E13BB4EA5AD2@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com>
References: <CAHbuEH49MaQmi1+3hxOeMd=hpim2KOn0rNDRpOBmt_oCYsCfHQ@mail.gmail.com> <BY2PR03MB44220D545698EE158AAF7A5F5ED0@BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BY2PR03MB44220D545698EE158AAF7A5F5ED0@BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-AU
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, en-AU
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E13BB4EA5AD2WSMSG3153Vsrv_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/1XoA1WsbRHqcxjp77vvTmNEQuiQ>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 04:03:51 -0000

That value uses strings for expiry and not-before dates so it is not a valid JWT; these dates need to be numbers.



3 of the examples in draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession are similarly invalid ("exp" and "iat"); 1 example gets it right.



--

James Manger



-----Original Message-----
From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mike Jones
Sent: Monday, 14 December 2015 2:40 PM
To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>om>; oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession



Yes.  Xbox One and its partners have been using this since its launch.  The following token claims are from a production trace captured in early 2013:



  {

   "iss":"xas.xboxlive.com",

   "aud":"http://auth.xboxlive.com",

   "exp":"1361398824",

   "nbf":"1360189224",

   "cnf":{

     "jwk":{

       "kty":"EC",

       "use":"sig",

       "crv":"P-256",

       "x":"18wHLeIgW9wVN6VD1Txgpqy2LszYkMf6J8njVAibvhM",

       "y":"-V4dS4UaLMgP_4fY4j8ir7cl1TXlFdAgcx55o7TkcSA"

      }

    }

  }



                                                                -- Mike



-----Original Message-----

From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kathleen Moriarty

Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 7:14 PM

To: oauth@ietf.org<mailto:oauth@ietf.org>

Subject: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession



Hi,



Are there any implementations of  draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession?



Thanks!



--



Best regards,

Kathleen



_______________________________________________

OAuth mailing list

OAuth@ietf.org<mailto:OAuth@ietf.org>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth



_______________________________________________

OAuth mailing list

OAuth@ietf.org<mailto:OAuth@ietf.org>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth