Re: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 14 December 2015 04:09 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92BD21A8942 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 20:09:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kme6Sw1OrufG for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 20:09:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C59D1A8848 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 20:09:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id n186so27763408wmn.0 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 20:09:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qK6hWEBe8VtORB1L20dqPpc24GEUO9af07hBkozAiFA=; b=hMgBz37s+MZqcKwABCk0HMaz3U0yUTqMiCrvzQ1cGa/IRlaEugPYpMOzH+/aADRoOM /Gh3sczeugbbahnr0WDKLcjd5Ektnj8PsRzKT3aIFiZxD6TT6DHnyTpHikD0Yt2BDqs8 sA1JLegf24b3wyDPzCvcbbwZARkaX9QBXRnFunTv9czwJJfxZFIbBpSVxPrE/CcNjOR0 7rqdkSAwwQ4CPQzxXN3DF7S6epjFlI4fXrE17ujLmHEFru0uEMbN6ln/v+1jKuyVSEUQ qx/Smrh6PVgi+LOOmxMcf1vZI4C0C3zREBgyDgiA1ClME88lySDDSePmEtB+DAdZYxaH 0ooQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.28.224.7 with SMTP id x7mr20530811wmg.17.1450066159022; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 20:09:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.28.52.130 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 20:09:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <BY2PR03MB44269B105305F4246D0563DF5ED0@BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAHbuEH49MaQmi1+3hxOeMd=hpim2KOn0rNDRpOBmt_oCYsCfHQ@mail.gmail.com> <BY2PR03MB44220D545698EE158AAF7A5F5ED0@BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E13BB4EA5AD2@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com> <BY2PR03MB44269B105305F4246D0563DF5ED0@BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 23:09:18 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH5_HaJCneDHykutGSjv0ejTdJ9hRc=CpCXaeWa+D_tbfQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/69w11jB5Skzls0de-DndYZ9Hs4M>
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 04:09:22 -0000

I just added the ballot for these drafts, can this be fixed quickly?

Thanks.
Kathleen

On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Mike Jones
<Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Good eye, James!  Thanks for catching this.  I’ll fix it right away.
>
>
>
> It turns out that examples are based on the trace captured in February 2013
> – well before the Xbox One launch in November 2013.  I’d actually noticed
> this then and had Xbox correct their code.  But silly me, I failed to
> uniformly correct it in the draft.
>
>
>
>                                                           Thanks again!
>
>                                                           -- Mike
>
>
>
> From: Manger, James [mailto:James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com]
> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 8:04 PM
> To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>om>; Kathleen Moriarty
> <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>om>; oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of
> draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession
>
>
>
> That value uses strings for expiry and not-before dates so it is not a valid
> JWT; these dates need to be numbers.
>
>
>
> 3 of the examples in draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession are similarly
> invalid (“exp” and “iat”); 1 example gets it right.
>
>
>
> --
>
> James Manger
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mike Jones
> Sent: Monday, 14 December 2015 2:40 PM
> To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>om>; oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of
> draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession
>
>
>
> Yes.  Xbox One and its partners have been using this since its launch.  The
> following token claims are from a production trace captured in early 2013:
>
>
>
>   {
>
>    "iss":"xas.xboxlive.com",
>
>    "aud":"http://auth.xboxlive.com",
>
>    "exp":"1361398824",
>
>    "nbf":"1360189224",
>
>    "cnf":{
>
>      "jwk":{
>
>        "kty":"EC",
>
>        "use":"sig",
>
>        "crv":"P-256",
>
>        "x":"18wHLeIgW9wVN6VD1Txgpqy2LszYkMf6J8njVAibvhM",
>
>        "y":"-V4dS4UaLMgP_4fY4j8ir7cl1TXlFdAgcx55o7TkcSA"
>
>       }
>
>     }
>
>   }
>
>
>
>                                                                 -- Mike
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kathleen Moriarty
>
> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 7:14 PM
>
> To: oauth@ietf.org
>
> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Are there any implementations of  draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession?
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Kathleen
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> OAuth mailing list
>
> OAuth@ietf.org
>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> OAuth mailing list
>
> OAuth@ietf.org
>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth



-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen