Re: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession

Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> Mon, 14 December 2015 04:33 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ED191A913A for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 20:33:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PKPq4EIh1-HX for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 20:33:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0121.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.121]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 762941A913D for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 20:33:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=upKRHfXJP3dXVbe2Zp/bY8nPOhF65UxCREnIVlJjkfA=; b=W8JkoaFBkXUzs7B9U0wZCQhe5vXxZBJXcMjKIVnGimNnGlqIU0vCSXGgrQFHT9InWtQ3Puigl6SHbOV4FMDBelGPjTDLgYiK2cVz+dKnQCZK9ZQj+Coa88Xkv7sEbNkNyefWNXfFguuKqXYRu7OK7dQh6iyly/GyoNauXrLVRk0=
Received: from BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.141.145) by BY2PR03MB443.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.141.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.355.16; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 04:33:05 +0000
Received: from BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.141.145]) by BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.141.145]) with mapi id 15.01.0355.012; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 04:33:05 +0000
From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession
Thread-Index: AQHRNiU1IGc6XVuMlEWvFje82tqI857J5K9w
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 04:33:04 +0000
Message-ID: <BY2PR03MB4427452170A07F8335F089EF5ED0@BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAHbuEH49MaQmi1+3hxOeMd=hpim2KOn0rNDRpOBmt_oCYsCfHQ@mail.gmail.com> <BY2PR03MB44220D545698EE158AAF7A5F5ED0@BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E13BB4EA5AD2@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com> <BY2PR03MB44269B105305F4246D0563DF5ED0@BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAHbuEH5_HaJCneDHykutGSjv0ejTdJ9hRc=CpCXaeWa+D_tbfQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHbuEH5_HaJCneDHykutGSjv0ejTdJ9hRc=CpCXaeWa+D_tbfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Michael.Jones@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [188.92.133.18]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2PR03MB443; 5:OA9w8LTSn98MRqIuiEnxsmaU8u5Y+saTQZW4O9609Y22kecL0HI31OlIFwp1lv7TR068aY8/hANNKJmY+CmhRqie560wbGdK3hAW8kiVbVJrECXJ0Tbyd4UuqeBlvBmqB3DKkip057MCZC2hOqk9RQ==; 24:GH2QfD3tIQ9CciJ5xBKvh24drwHfUJ3t2DsQvbowvZ+u5V6CsARPUlmd9rvdrUQjcQ4D92ymrU0mpbpvds8M54DDNwGgrOm4poJZXUd4hW0=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR03MB443;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY2PR03MB443C95CB5BDF8AECAEB92B3F5ED0@BY2PR03MB443.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(520078)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(61426038)(61427038); SRVR:BY2PR03MB443; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR03MB443;
x-forefront-prvs: 0790FB1F33
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(52604005)(43784003)(199003)(24454002)(189002)(377454003)(13464003)(74316001)(16601075003)(5002640100001)(2950100001)(93886004)(33656002)(5003600100002)(2900100001)(92566002)(15975445007)(101416001)(102836003)(10090500001)(6116002)(3846002)(5008740100001)(230783001)(5004730100002)(77096005)(586003)(1096002)(10290500002)(66066001)(10400500002)(106116001)(105586002)(1220700001)(99286002)(8990500004)(54356999)(11100500001)(86362001)(5005710100001)(122556002)(50986999)(40100003)(19580405001)(97736004)(5001960100002)(87936001)(81156007)(19580395003)(110136002)(189998001)(76176999)(106356001)(86612001)(76576001)(7059030); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR03MB443; H:BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 Dec 2015 04:33:04.9648 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR03MB443
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/bax01BDBybASw9hly3FXA5azufs>
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 04:33:11 -0000

Done in -09.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kathleen Moriarty [mailto:kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 8:09 PM
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
Cc: Manger, James <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com>om>; oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession

I just added the ballot for these drafts, can this be fixed quickly?

Thanks.
Kathleen

On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Good eye, James!  Thanks for catching this.  I’ll fix it right away.
>
>
>
> It turns out that examples are based on the trace captured in February 
> 2013 – well before the Xbox One launch in November 2013.  I’d actually 
> noticed this then and had Xbox correct their code.  But silly me, I 
> failed to uniformly correct it in the draft.
>
>
>
>                                                           Thanks again!
>
>                                                           -- Mike
>
>
>
> From: Manger, James [mailto:James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com]
> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 8:04 PM
> To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>om>; Kathleen Moriarty 
> <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>om>; oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of 
> draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession
>
>
>
> That value uses strings for expiry and not-before dates so it is not a 
> valid JWT; these dates need to be numbers.
>
>
>
> 3 of the examples in draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession are 
> similarly invalid (“exp” and “iat”); 1 example gets it right.
>
>
>
> --
>
> James Manger
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mike Jones
> Sent: Monday, 14 December 2015 2:40 PM
> To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>om>; 
> oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of 
> draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession
>
>
>
> Yes.  Xbox One and its partners have been using this since its launch.  
> The following token claims are from a production trace captured in early 2013:
>
>
>
>   {
>
>    "iss":"xas.xboxlive.com",
>
>    "aud":"http://auth.xboxlive.com",
>
>    "exp":"1361398824",
>
>    "nbf":"1360189224",
>
>    "cnf":{
>
>      "jwk":{
>
>        "kty":"EC",
>
>        "use":"sig",
>
>        "crv":"P-256",
>
>        "x":"18wHLeIgW9wVN6VD1Txgpqy2LszYkMf6J8njVAibvhM",
>
>        "y":"-V4dS4UaLMgP_4fY4j8ir7cl1TXlFdAgcx55o7TkcSA"
>
>       }
>
>     }
>
>   }
>
>
>
>                                                                 -- 
> Mike
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kathleen 
> Moriarty
>
> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 7:14 PM
>
> To: oauth@ietf.org
>
> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of 
> draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Are there any implementations of  draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession?
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Kathleen
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> OAuth mailing list
>
> OAuth@ietf.org
>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> OAuth mailing list
>
> OAuth@ietf.org
>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth



-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen