Re: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 14 December 2015 05:16 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A501AC41C for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 21:16:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LS7JjOM3_kGb for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 21:16:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22d.google.com (mail-qk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB0C31AC422 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 21:16:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qkck189 with SMTP id k189so84408228qkc.0 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 21:16:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:mime-version:subject:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=zde3mt8eTrvk7TvMV/2Lj4WZsJcSr+iR6jhOIp0e/U8=; b=WD0yfYCnXKk40bHutDSar3EQUucp1Wo5CGkkY2JkuRsGkt+i1ymLYHiqmb27oAtOEE 8yJheU8worOCI1ZxotnAPxxl0/srw7lTSh70HBxkL2300fuNSw0Tzj9eEhrT/Pdu7xNZ WKfROhvcdLcO0DKQ3iK4ILoYx1X32CNb+LrF19bCLo5vQkTb7OF1DgnaMMi5+GVUuTcB XQq/R5Q1bxC12PzOyzReT6Vs8MRSjGsO9lHYpxWyn99H2plHEZhiazZ0Hf2rHMZIYc/e E6jKkjzbtXMTWVS0CQZRJn6kMxOZALpSKGM9zvBSskD6oGefOx5Fm9b07XUsx1mdZxQN MPFQ==
X-Received: by 10.55.79.15 with SMTP id d15mr1646433qkb.17.1450070180065; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 21:16:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.20.1.204] ([65.200.157.66]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e80sm10025183qkj.30.2015.12.13.21.16.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 13 Dec 2015 21:16:19 -0800 (PST)
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12H143)
In-Reply-To: <BY2PR03MB4427452170A07F8335F089EF5ED0@BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 00:16:18 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <71106BB0-14DC-43F6-A057-D584B08366AF@gmail.com>
References: <CAHbuEH49MaQmi1+3hxOeMd=hpim2KOn0rNDRpOBmt_oCYsCfHQ@mail.gmail.com> <BY2PR03MB44220D545698EE158AAF7A5F5ED0@BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E13BB4EA5AD2@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com> <BY2PR03MB44269B105305F4246D0563DF5ED0@BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAHbuEH5_HaJCneDHykutGSjv0ejTdJ9hRc=CpCXaeWa+D_tbfQ@mail.gmail.com> <BY2PR03MB4427452170A07F8335F089EF5ED0@BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/9ribBokRX2Rohzen259dkyuPkxk>
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 05:16:24 -0000

Thank you!

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 13, 2015, at 11:33 PM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> wrote:
> 
> Done in -09.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kathleen Moriarty [mailto:kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 8:09 PM
> To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
> Cc: Manger, James <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com>om>; oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession
> 
> I just added the ballot for these drafts, can this be fixed quickly?
> 
> Thanks.
> Kathleen
> 
>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> Good eye, James!  Thanks for catching this.  I’ll fix it right away.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> It turns out that examples are based on the trace captured in February 
>> 2013 – well before the Xbox One launch in November 2013.  I’d actually 
>> noticed this then and had Xbox correct their code.  But silly me, I 
>> failed to uniformly correct it in the draft.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>                                                          Thanks again!
>> 
>>                                                          -- Mike
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: Manger, James [mailto:James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 8:04 PM
>> To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>om>; Kathleen Moriarty 
>> <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>om>; oauth@ietf.org
>> Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of 
>> draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> That value uses strings for expiry and not-before dates so it is not a 
>> valid JWT; these dates need to be numbers.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 3 of the examples in draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession are 
>> similarly invalid (“exp” and “iat”); 1 example gets it right.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> James Manger
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mike Jones
>> Sent: Monday, 14 December 2015 2:40 PM
>> To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>om>; 
>> oauth@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of 
>> draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Yes.  Xbox One and its partners have been using this since its launch.  
>> The following token claims are from a production trace captured in early 2013:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  {
>> 
>>   "iss":"xas.xboxlive.com",
>> 
>>   "aud":"http://auth.xboxlive.com",
>> 
>>   "exp":"1361398824",
>> 
>>   "nbf":"1360189224",
>> 
>>   "cnf":{
>> 
>>     "jwk":{
>> 
>>       "kty":"EC",
>> 
>>       "use":"sig",
>> 
>>       "crv":"P-256",
>> 
>>       "x":"18wHLeIgW9wVN6VD1Txgpqy2LszYkMf6J8njVAibvhM",
>> 
>>       "y":"-V4dS4UaLMgP_4fY4j8ir7cl1TXlFdAgcx55o7TkcSA"
>> 
>>      }
>> 
>>    }
>> 
>>  }
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>                                                                -- 
>> Mike
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> 
>> From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kathleen 
>> Moriarty
>> 
>> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 7:14 PM
>> 
>> To: oauth@ietf.org
>> 
>> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of 
>> draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Are there any implementations of  draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Kathleen
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> 
>> OAuth mailing list
>> 
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> 
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> 
>> OAuth mailing list
>> 
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> 
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Best regards,
> Kathleen