Re: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession

Thank you!

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 13, 2015, at 11:33 PM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> wrote:
> 
> Done in -09.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kathleen Moriarty [mailto:kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 8:09 PM
> To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
> Cc: Manger, James <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com>; oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession
> 
> I just added the ballot for these drafts, can this be fixed quickly?
> 
> Thanks.
> Kathleen
> 
>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> Good eye, James!  Thanks for catching this.  I’ll fix it right away.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> It turns out that examples are based on the trace captured in February 
>> 2013 – well before the Xbox One launch in November 2013.  I’d actually 
>> noticed this then and had Xbox correct their code.  But silly me, I 
>> failed to uniformly correct it in the draft.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>                                                          Thanks again!
>> 
>>                                                          -- Mike
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: Manger, James [mailto:James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 8:04 PM
>> To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>; Kathleen Moriarty 
>> <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>; oauth@ietf.org
>> Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of 
>> draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> That value uses strings for expiry and not-before dates so it is not a 
>> valid JWT; these dates need to be numbers.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 3 of the examples in draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession are 
>> similarly invalid (“exp” and “iat”); 1 example gets it right.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> James Manger
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mike Jones
>> Sent: Monday, 14 December 2015 2:40 PM
>> To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>; 
>> oauth@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of 
>> draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Yes.  Xbox One and its partners have been using this since its launch.  
>> The following token claims are from a production trace captured in early 2013:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  {
>> 
>>   "iss":"xas.xboxlive.com",
>> 
>>   "aud":"http://auth.xboxlive.com",
>> 
>>   "exp":"1361398824",
>> 
>>   "nbf":"1360189224",
>> 
>>   "cnf":{
>> 
>>     "jwk":{
>> 
>>       "kty":"EC",
>> 
>>       "use":"sig",
>> 
>>       "crv":"P-256",
>> 
>>       "x":"18wHLeIgW9wVN6VD1Txgpqy2LszYkMf6J8njVAibvhM",
>> 
>>       "y":"-V4dS4UaLMgP_4fY4j8ir7cl1TXlFdAgcx55o7TkcSA"
>> 
>>      }
>> 
>>    }
>> 
>>  }
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>                                                                -- 
>> Mike
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> 
>> From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kathleen 
>> Moriarty
>> 
>> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 7:14 PM
>> 
>> To: oauth@ietf.org
>> 
>> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of 
>> draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Are there any implementations of  draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Kathleen
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> 
>> OAuth mailing list
>> 
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> 
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> 
>> OAuth mailing list
>> 
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> 
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Best regards,
> Kathleen