Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposed agenda for second interim meeting

[Peter Saint-Andre <[e-mail]>]

On 2/4/10 11:52 AM, Dick Hardt wrote:
> 
> On 2010-02-04, at 10:47 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> 
>> <hat type='chair'/>
>> 
>> On 2/3/10 11:55 AM, Dick Hardt wrote:
>>> I recall from the call that Peter did ask if there was consensus
>>> on the approach of gathering use cases. There seemed consensus
>>> that the WG might not fully understand the problem and that this
>>> made sense.
>> 
>> I agree, but given that we haven't had a lot of discussion about
>> use cases on the list, I figured it would be more productive to
>> focus this call on the authentication work, encourage more people
>> to contribute use cases over the next two weeks, and then discuss
>> use cases on the next call (slated for February 11, I need to
>> schedule that today).
> 
> Works for me.
> 
> I'm hopeful someone can explain what is meant by "authentication
> work"!
> 
> From my understanding of Eran's draft, I don't see the distinction
> between Authorization Server and Protected Resource we have in OAuth
> WRAP.

By "Eran's draft" do you mean draft-ietf-oauth-authentication-01 or
draft-hammer-http-token-auth-01?

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/