Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption for "Resource Indicators for OAuth 2.0"

Yes there was.

+1 to adopt this document.

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> wrote:

> William: there was discussion in the meeting about the PoP document using
> "resource" rather than "aud"
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 4:53 PM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones=40microsoft.
> com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Microsoft’s Azure AD OAuth server has used the resource= parameter since
>> at least 2012 to indicate what resource the requested access token is to be
>> for.
>>
>>
>>
>>                                                        -- Mike
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* William Denniss <wdenniss@google.com>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 19, 2018 4:40 PM
>> *To:* Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>
>> *Cc:* Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>; oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption for "Resource Indicators for
>> OAuth 2.0"
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks! I assume then that there are use-cases for this that are outside
>> the Distributed OAuth use-case? Did we document them?  I'm supportive (of
>> both drafts), but think we should get the rationale on the record since the
>> option to incorporate this spec in Distributed OAuth was raised in the
>> meeting.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 1:34 PM, Hannes Tschofenig <
>> Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi William,
>>
>>
>>
>> that was the idea.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ciao
>>
>> Hannes
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *William
>> Denniss
>> *Sent:* 19 July 2018 16:32
>> *To:* Mike Jones
>> *Cc:* oauth
>> *Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption for "Resource Indicators for
>> OAuth 2.0"
>>
>>
>>
>> Question: if this is adopted along with https://datatracker.ietf.
>> org/doc/draft-hardt-oauth-distributed/, is the plan for this spec to be
>> the authoritative definition, and Distributed OAuth to take a reference
>> instead of redefining?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 1:29 PM, Mike Jones <
>> Michael.Jones=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>> I support adoption.  The “resource” request parameter that it defines is
>> already widely used.
>>
>>
>>
>>                                                        -- Mike
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* OAuth <oauth-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 19, 2018 4:02 PM
>> *To:* oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
>> *Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption for "Resource Indicators for
>> OAuth 2.0"
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This is the call for adoption of the 'Resource Indicators for OAuth 2.0'
>> document
>> following the positive call for adoption at the Montreal IETF meeting.
>>
>> Here is the document:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-campbell-oauth-resource-indicators-02
>>
>> Please let us know by August 2nd whether you accept / object to the
>> adoption of this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth
>> working group.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Rifaat
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>
>>
>>
>> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
>> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
>> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
>> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the
>> information in any medium. Thank you.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>
>>
>