Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption for "Resource Indicators for OAuth 2.0"

Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> Thu, 19 July 2018 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFA5130F7B for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 14:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3WEB9W7UJIIh for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 14:11:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52e.google.com (mail-pg1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76443130F59 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 14:11:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id r5-v6so4849657pgv.0 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 14:11:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=iXpX0s4T9gJsVZH6rozIfpurE4rk1+BoSO2UW+e9bKc=; b=bVhk71MUvmxV5uMdUBqk6yvVklEgmTB5ewiridpjmdWUvgU5br2Ms1aTBxIxCG+62l LtW059lJFzeSh8n6PtpcF6ZZpLtg8VelTN8WyHeGK5J56GP9Y6gLQezvTsw5jrDMiwct KJGWWSHyrCdZdUudjT1QZl8WR735sSfeocTN4ZDDcCqucrb7J8oNiUbrwkTgRHBVp5EE KWvuLa9PJw6dVw5dGh46i1LFt9KPR8Li9Ju0fwOocu69AkYFV/mpK0RO7ckK/qCFR6Q1 x/nC2OBOQImi0134xwRPCJQH8t9GIwBFbX8fJagowHhnIKnh6xh837yLLUvt5bxcTCGL 1kVg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iXpX0s4T9gJsVZH6rozIfpurE4rk1+BoSO2UW+e9bKc=; b=puZ0M/2L6FeViTf55gzw8kMDajkUKcqHFHV7WqLN/gTPxi4VFztMvuSztZ/AHyzwV8 LMFGNi0fg70hOrsMhudBXFFPctUzuUJVoxStTnc7O0iGlDzVL9zzQblnbqQHVgV1J98o 49dEbFkJ9e4SOxrXfQ5DTB7gvkuxDVk9TRCAm8UKdiPYLhfe7ClAAKyeuELKXQDzbSYS GRM1BdgYFMsX2wdhSgR+3nVnpbK8Tunn5k8JiuornpVXj7AIFlvxN6qxnxHki701nNi4 nIYQ8wTU+fsjOAgTiPOX38R3yFSc2Q6+moZ1YRcHkUWRdtz2ZZGERXl92kXZGWfdM0wJ p0Gg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlEJxnrd1wN/LQ0US9CdDuoazUO2yaCRJt2s4wQNgLsxW6z64DhI 222taB5i92ywYzTYxLElBp0hGLK0h6/1CWEg1Gc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfxnAjDMkAOBYy81W4x22iqixRLqs2iKV4VrZ0CAGJNcnEdFLWi6yU1Y4eyjpbWkL7tdPd02pkFdPHOd56G+NU=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:6243:: with SMTP id w64-v6mr11471748pgb.179.1532034696930; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 14:11:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a17:90a:9ce:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 14:11:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <DM5PR00MB02967D18645764A7E598B4EFF5520@DM5PR00MB0296.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAGL6ep+p-JsvuT5imuNN=NXg2rGX98omibO7KeGxAu3yGpaiWg@mail.gmail.com> <DM5PR00MB0296804218028EEB46142372F5520@DM5PR00MB0296.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <CAAP42hARSW1jk7nE=kcDMajUj8Z=vPhD3ZcK6p_EenZhxLJfgQ@mail.gmail.com> <VI1PR0801MB2112EDA04FB2A57F2CF6CA5CFA520@VI1PR0801MB2112.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <CAAP42hAfsW2i-D64WzfCCZ8qf=+kq1ao-UHubrvVUT=HVuY0AQ@mail.gmail.com> <DM5PR00MB02967D18645764A7E598B4EFF5520@DM5PR00MB0296.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
From: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:11:16 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD9ie-v4=r4XWVbvGryh24iQ_uXbHO8cd0=L2yc4XtbecmOvpw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: William Denniss <wdenniss@google.com>, Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>, oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e4eb480571609f19"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/TtH2CCeywfN0otVO_9hXYfE-gZQ>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption for "Resource Indicators for OAuth 2.0"
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 21:11:41 -0000

William: there was discussion in the meeting about the PoP document using
"resource" rather than "aud"

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 4:53 PM, Mike Jones <
Michael.Jones=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Microsoft’s Azure AD OAuth server has used the resource= parameter since
> at least 2012 to indicate what resource the requested access token is to be
> for.
>
>
>
>                                                        -- Mike
>
>
>
> *From:* William Denniss <wdenniss@google.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 19, 2018 4:40 PM
> *To:* Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>
> *Cc:* Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>; oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption for "Resource Indicators for
> OAuth 2.0"
>
>
>
> Thanks! I assume then that there are use-cases for this that are outside
> the Distributed OAuth use-case? Did we document them?  I'm supportive (of
> both drafts), but think we should get the rationale on the record since the
> option to incorporate this spec in Distributed OAuth was raised in the
> meeting.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 1:34 PM, Hannes Tschofenig <
> Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi William,
>
>
>
> that was the idea.
>
>
>
> Ciao
>
> Hannes
>
>
>
> *From:* OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *William
> Denniss
> *Sent:* 19 July 2018 16:32
> *To:* Mike Jones
> *Cc:* oauth
> *Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption for "Resource Indicators for
> OAuth 2.0"
>
>
>
> Question: if this is adopted along with https://datatracker.ietf.
> org/doc/draft-hardt-oauth-distributed/, is the plan for this spec to be
> the authoritative definition, and Distributed OAuth to take a reference
> instead of redefining?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 1:29 PM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones=40microsoft.
> com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> I support adoption.  The “resource” request parameter that it defines is
> already widely used.
>
>
>
>                                                        -- Mike
>
>
>
> *From:* OAuth <oauth-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 19, 2018 4:02 PM
> *To:* oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption for "Resource Indicators for
> OAuth 2.0"
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> This is the call for adoption of the 'Resource Indicators for OAuth 2.0'
> document
> following the positive call for adoption at the Montreal IETF meeting.
>
> Here is the document:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-campbell-oauth-resource-indicators-02
>
> Please let us know by August 2nd whether you accept / object to the
> adoption of this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth
> working group.
>
> Regards,
> Rifaat
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the
> information in any medium. Thank you.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>