Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (3446)

thanks!

nov

On Jan 10, 2013, at 8:24 AM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 01/09/2013 11:02 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>> Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> writes:
>> 
>>>> Corrected Text
>>>> --------------
>>>> Resource owners cannot revoke access to an individual third party without revoking access
>>>> to all third parties, and must do so by changing their password.
>>>> 
>>>> Notes
>>>> -----
>>>> The text was originally "their" but changed to "the third party's" between the last draft and RFC.
>>>> However, "their" means "resource owners'", not "the third party's".
>>> 
>>> Yes, this appears to be a change the RFC Editor made that the authors
>>> didn't notice in AUTH48.  But the RFC Editor change it from "their"
>>> because "their" wasn't clear.  Changing it back to "their" won't help
>>> that.  I suggest editing the corrected text to "by changing the
>>> resource owner's password" before marking this as Verified.
>> 
>> Yep, I suggested that same change in a private email to Stephen, so I
>> would prefer this modification.
> 
> Ok, assuming nobody objects I'll verify this that way tomorrow.
> 
> Cheers,
> S
> 
>> 
>>> Barry
>> 
>> -derek
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth