[OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (3446)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 08 January 2013 01:29 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6FB321F876E for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 17:29:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.051, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ChDOSasTjiGO for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 17:29:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3254E21F8684 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 17:29:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 22098B1E007; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 17:19:35 -0800 (PST)
To: dick.hardt@gmail.com, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, turners@ieca.com, Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net, derek@ihtfp.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20130108011935.22098B1E007@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 17:19:35 -0800
Cc: nov@matake.jp, oauth@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (3446)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 01:29:52 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6749, "The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6749&eid=3446 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Nov Matake <nov@matake.jp> Section: 1 Original Text ------------- Resource owners cannot revoke access to an individual third party without revoking access to all third parties, and must do so by changing the third party's password. Corrected Text -------------- Resource owners cannot revoke access to an individual third party without revoking access to all third parties, and must do so by changing their password. Notes ----- The text was originally "their" but changed to "the third party's" between the last draft and RFC. However, "their" means "resource owners'", not "the third party's". Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6749 (draft-ietf-oauth-v2-31) -------------------------------------- Title : The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework Publication Date : October 2012 Author(s) : D. Hardt, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Web Authorization Protocol Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (3… RFC Errata System
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC674… Barry Leiba
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC674… Derek Atkins
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC674… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC674… nov matake