IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of -22

Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com> Wed, 02 November 2011 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01BD11E80F0 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 10:48:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.504
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.095, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nwm80td1US7K for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 10:48:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.180.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 41C1011E8094 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 10:48:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 5529 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2011 17:48:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.ex1.secureserver.net) (72.167.180.20) by p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with SMTP; 2 Nov 2011 17:48:28 -0000
Received: from P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([10.6.135.19]) by P3PW5EX1HT002.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([72.167.180.20]) with mapi; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 10:48:20 -0700
From: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 10:47:32 -0700
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of -22
Thread-Index: AcyJy5Q+tkGr+RYzQbigAYqj4zsdKgPu+sLi
Message-ID: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E7234526332101E@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
References: <4E971C36.7050000@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <4E971C36.7050000@cs.tcd.ie>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of -22
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 17:48:33 -0000

I have not seen any responses to these items so I assume the group is in agreement with the comments made. I will push out a revised ID addressing these items in a few days.

EHL

________________________________________
From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Farrell [stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 10:13 AM
To: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of -22

Hi all,

Sorry for having been quite slow with this, but I had a bunch
of travel recently.

Anyway, my AD comments on -22 are attached. I think that the
first list has the ones that need some change before we push
this out for IETF LC, there might or might not be something
to change as a result of the 2nd list of questions and the
rest are really nits can be handled either now or later.

Thanks for all your work on this so far - its nearly there
IMO and we should be able to get the IETF LC started once
these few things are dealt with.

Cheers,
S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email