IETF Logo Mail Archive

[OAUTH-WG] AD review of -22

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 13 October 2011 17:13 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BA721F8A64 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:13:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.700, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_35=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sttIql0MGigb for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:13:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scss.tcd.ie (hermes.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.32.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF53821F8ADE for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E87171C70 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:13:28 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; h= content-type:subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:date :message-id:received:received:x-virus-scanned; s=cs; t= 1318526007; bh=y8+yUwszaJC3WNQgXe21ril1hRK29CoFY47qDnCCvVo=; b=J Z2llAh7Zkq22yUHN8M3fEeVwS/dEtzeSJbdrrLouu27J5JBy35DxosBPsiaSJOmg vUzBEO60Kii2hazg2v9Q4LYA9q60kZVhC8mIB2fz+UHH9w8uiXSz4Aorkw22Pkog CxUSqBdsnstGEO0LwR0rD1vOWF1YBB76CSo0UBFAvXF5FCBKaFcf2B7hmYbSyD+7 G2Pq0SpmZD2eiey7d0Gk7wYN+k+FjDU2kKotXH2yWIIn96816uD+NT8fKbppd4ll k/OzVDfGsJh6AN1T2cmEySgzSxJvCZLAz0EwQa0DUNMtCwMVJYRCEPwMwGI7yzF6 hXbI0bpyNogqKPpp8oJcw==
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with ESMTP id 4M8gqSxiDi-c for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:13:27 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.87.48.8] (unknown [86.42.24.80]) by smtp.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 843AD171C71 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:13:26 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <4E971C36.7050000@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:13:26 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080909020901040701060003"
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of -22
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:13:35 -0000

Hi all,

Sorry for having been quite slow with this, but I had a bunch
of travel recently.

Anyway, my AD comments on -22 are attached. I think that the
first list has the ones that need some change before we push
this out for IETF LC, there might or might not be something
to change as a result of the 2nd list of questions and the
rest are really nits can be handled either now or later.

Thanks for all your work on this so far - its nearly there
IMO and we should be able to get the IETF LC started once
these few things are dealt with.

Cheers,
S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email