IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] New Version Notification for draft-fett-oauth-dpop-03.txt

Neil Madden <neil.madden@forgerock.com> Wed, 27 November 2019 20:30 UTC

Return-Path: <neil.madden@forgerock.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD44120A81 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 12:30:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=forgerock.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uU89qmCoZkdq for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 12:30:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm1-x331.google.com (mail-wm1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::331]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1576C120C99 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 12:30:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id b11so8509302wmj.4 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 12:30:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=forgerock.com; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=vpkaRbm21BhmgDUy9OUmFiCAtChmpinirN9gjJCFBvU=; b=aZuAzqIDps6dAlTZwbmjoGJXrO4qo0JilIHUdHjuPo/hstylAEUttVwFi5tN6SRbCS 48bOxZSv1NCL7dif2OPHoZH1AxpXdMWwMz/o7MZKrKlQ5G5tYwmObqkXVgB147d5QlJo 3y7svWcIEnGV/33ACQWvwMEDNOKHuAYsw3UXQ=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=vpkaRbm21BhmgDUy9OUmFiCAtChmpinirN9gjJCFBvU=; b=tji1FGK4zd6Vx3xA2u11vop4XKSJp+DmtGj+Iklbqn67Wqk0n6d5DcRinbSkQE66V7 WFg9PNDfaiSMMC+Q9iPneca5dgT/xDO/ytbbzq1Sx5no+SsZCGlEQEoDymS39NMWjlFG htgW1Rs/q6IbbOA5HV9PnAcuzgJ0NIGlKmihKsySKysFeSpo0qyQXk2EF+mqInMvpiAQ 5zrdTQDu/Cjmadx3wes/xsKU56085m2cx+2bVz/cimUnk+yxBjEhRJG8rNoxJMR2zIIM XqX5S5cCFY+P4miihdmpNwfUokfY14L+ZNx88HPVNrSzEFzZwIX0SArCsDm2aR0gLXyC H7pw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWf9ybAf9XUzQt2uTUXCau0keiLYitN+WT9gZUkOICBGo6Qd1om 3cSM+kFPA1S2gfkSeZV5GsSZ9Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyJmNU1mPETYb2iYpHksW3ZWXEs7Q9tseYXlXvpSHcTwCFYo+/TlBFBr1MHPUyKIU75GJiETg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:34c:: with SMTP id u12mr6293621wmd.3.1574886618206; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 12:30:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2a01:4c8:1e:a0cd:9d35:32b:7c76:aa8b? ([2a01:4c8:1e:a0cd:9d35:32b:7c76:aa8b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f1sm2113536wrp.93.2019.11.27.12.30.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Nov 2019 12:30:17 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-2D69D42E-FD3F-4BA1-BEB6-10B3C958AEED"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Neil Madden <neil.madden@forgerock.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 20:30:16 +0000
Message-Id: <EFE1FB6B-23CE-4C15-AA71-0984F633B27E@forgerock.com>
References: <CA+k3eCSxyS+A76qMZL4qE5jkkrdXJ5-riWX7UkOB8SYiBxw1mQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "Richard Backman, Annabelle" <richanna@amazon.com>, oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CA+k3eCSxyS+A76qMZL4qE5jkkrdXJ5-riWX7UkOB8SYiBxw1mQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17A878)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/ueEoz0YLdlFcYkiZczN4sCxvDLU>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] New Version Notification for draft-fett-oauth-dpop-03.txt
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 20:30:25 -0000

> On 27 Nov 2019, at 19:19, Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 3:31 AM Neil Madden <neil.madden@forgerock.com> wrote:
>> 
>> That is true, but is IMO more of a hindrance than an advantage for a PoP scheme. The very fact that the signature is valid at every RS is why you need additional measures to prevent cross-RS token reuse. This downside of signatures for authentication was pointed out by djb 18 years ago (https://groups.google.com/forum/m/#!msg/sci.crypt/73yb5a9pz2Y/LNgRO7IYXOwJ), which is why most modern crypto protocols either use Diffie-Hellman for authN (https://noiseprotocol.org) or sign a hash of an interactive handshake transcript (TLS 1.3 - https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8446#section-4.4.3) so that the signature is tightly bound to a specific interactive protocol run.
>> 
> 
> Mostly for my own edification -  using Diffie-Hellman for authN (that a key was held) was effectively at the heart of the "tentative suggestion for an alternative design" that you had much early in this thread?

Yes, exactly.

— Neil

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email