Re: [openpgp] Version 5 key and fingerprint proposal

Jon Callas <joncallas@icloud.com> Thu, 09 March 2017 22:01 UTC

Return-Path: <joncallas@icloud.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E9E129504 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 14:01:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=icloud.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id no9N44V1z841 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 14:01:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from st13p27im-asmtp004.me.com (st13p27im-asmtp004.me.com [17.162.190.113]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0488F12946D for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 14:01:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from process-dkim-sign-daemon.st13p27im-asmtp004.me.com by st13p27im-asmtp004.me.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.38.0 64bit (built Feb 26 2016)) id <0OMK00P00IEW0H00@st13p27im-asmtp004.me.com> for openpgp@ietf.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 22:01:13 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=icloud.com; s=4d515a; t=1489096873; bh=fzAEYsNRKFGv9qkrVE1Fj2mRBwwV82urxswsrxr39oQ=; h=Content-type:MIME-version:Subject:From:Date:Message-id:To; b=cbMft88bYYAIOv8BrYtE+qzn1i2UV/vv1BWZ+bZy5eHAKQaDwSVw6Q96p5tJme0l9 J6+f3y1DkPLZUvEGl5QZOqadCFfdCe2tmwQ+C/3CARk6sKXk8KitppYavneVvDZnGQ ISCmCDhgm5YJzzwnzIR/vrvSaEEMtgZgoO7lejcqr0HwsS5nkUlwfc0QjbizovxM63 cZjM/wP7SrhM0pofhtw7hWBvD1aEnxhghU2BdWUSJPnyk/ytzbmWXF8kY1tjVE3wl1 157oc9PmQb8q3OFH2UpSGgmdg9rNhzNUu8w0S0bb23tYTHDt8EMBJqelaVIHZGVMkJ FtZIa9v4AL1Ww==
Received: from icloud.com ([127.0.0.1]) by st13p27im-asmtp004.me.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.38.0 64bit (built Feb 26 2016)) with ESMTPSA id <0OMK00ARWIHZKI00@st13p27im-asmtp004.me.com> for openpgp@ietf.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 22:01:12 +0000 (GMT)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2017-03-09_18:,, signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1034 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1701120000 definitions=main-1703090160
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Jon Callas <joncallas@icloud.com>
In-reply-to: <CABcZeBMhpXy-e9Mtp8LwfqfAVW_ks3JBw1H2N3H_0c4gpQBqpg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 14:01:10 -0800
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Message-id: <DAC23A62-14BF-4AAA-8E52-09029B279E8F@icloud.com>
References: <87varlou5m.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> <20170307230605.GA2@hashbang.sh> <87efy8ntcx.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> <20170309174531.GB2@hashbang.sh> <20170309184745.GC2@hashbang.sh> <CABcZeBMhpXy-e9Mtp8LwfqfAVW_ks3JBw1H2N3H_0c4gpQBqpg@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF OpenPGP <openpgp@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/2zFEOkuHBPYguYEo_bnV0UDD8VA>
Cc: Jon Callas <joncallas@icloud.com>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Version 5 key and fingerprint proposal
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 22:01:15 -0000

At the risk of sending this into a rathole, a viable alternative would be to use SHA512/t as a truncation function. It's got a well-defined way to deal with the issues of naive truncations, and you don't have to worry about defining how to truncate. If you want a 200 bit hash, you can just get one.

	Jon