IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] [PATCH] RFC4880bis: Argon2i

Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> Tue, 03 November 2015 03:55 UTC

Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D0DE1B2C85 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 19:55:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6btqRfIG1yzN for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 19:55:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [209.234.253.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A23F31A900A for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 19:55:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fifthhorseman.net (dhcp-36-99.meeting.ietf94.jp [133.93.36.99]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FAFFF984; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 22:55:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 393BE1FFEF; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 12:55:04 +0900 (JST)
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
To: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>, Nils Durner <ndurner@googlemail.com>, "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4B5168F@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>
References: <5623AA95.4060903@googlemail.com> <874mh3q3ol.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4B5168F@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 12:55:04 +0900
Message-ID: <87io5johyf.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/R_n1nFC7JHeb3DWA_NritXnCcAk>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] [PATCH] RFC4880bis: Argon2i
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 03:55:30 -0000

On Tue 2015-11-03 11:48:07 +0900, Peter Gutmann wrote:
> Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> writes:
>
>>If we introduce this as a normative dependency for OpenPGP, though, we might
>>also want to have an IETF RFC for Argon2.  Do you know of anyone working on
>>such a draft?
>
> Uh, yeah, started it, got distracted by other work, I'll take this as a hint
> to finish it :-).

Please do, thank you!

> I was going to post it here first in any case to get feedback, since
> it's more a proposal that needs comment on how people would prefer
> certain things to be done.

I'm happy to have it posted here for review.  If it's a description of
the algorithm on its own, we can also point the CFRG at it.

    --dkg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email