Re: [openpgp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-01.txt

Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> Tue, 16 February 2021 00:11 UTC

Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03053A08A5 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 16:11:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.306
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.306 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=fifthhorseman.net header.b=h0QkrhPW; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fifthhorseman.net header.b=caQc1cC8
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5VD528_gbn6z for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 16:11:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from che.mayfirst.org (unknown [162.247.75.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88C873A089C for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 16:11:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019; t=1613434262; h=from : to : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=BrCM/4IHF1Ad33MdHNCeKy3TG0xJGdJVMcF1VKyXSdM=; b=h0QkrhPWXy6pNdf1emElJxMLyQpTTo+ndwR7Y/1+5jdBOHAclpYE0XdQ70lb5DU6FPn1h qqAH3jPriGmbHPUAg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019rsa; t=1613434262; h=from : to : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=BrCM/4IHF1Ad33MdHNCeKy3TG0xJGdJVMcF1VKyXSdM=; b=caQc1cC8SzZT3+fv47eMVpL2azDb0+J2oUW1cnHB6V9+mgABF6TJkeah82QXjvIezpCKj P1sEtuXtvFcidqP5btHW4rP5qBVbCUtSHrrdPK66pdemZ74xq6Jx24SEqqxLg/USoHSOZbw 8EJECQfyNE7YxI15WghtNMpOCVt3OMCHmUvPI2jI3sdNc186/3NiZTOouQCoxPXA49olK38 2g2blqJQ6bWpXcjoc2HLCb4LYAN7Y6AqGuwX5E+LlSe+Dx1TTUgjxcYZlS1uyPclv+51qAN Mj5FUBp4rF8SiDOWcNufDsg+uGFLmr6Y5zns4N+Tl/+iyo1g3yS0QnJzz08w==
Received: from fifthhorseman.net (lair.fifthhorseman.net [108.58.6.98]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4B82F9A5; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 19:11:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0C3D220456; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 19:11:00 -0500 (EST)
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, openpgp@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <42567509-8e46-701d-e435-a8cf2b6cab64@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <161254580617.29620.7114088127291075805@ietfa.amsl.com> <44a9245e-d6af-8919-6d35-3c7672bfa54b@nohats.ca> <42567509-8e46-701d-e435-a8cf2b6cab64@cs.tcd.ie>
Autocrypt: addr=dkg@fifthhorseman.net; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEX+i03xYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdACA4xvL/xI5dHedcnkfViyq84doe8zFRid9jW7CC9XBiI0QQf FgoAgwWCX+i03wWJBZ+mAAMLCQcJEOCS6zpcoQ26RxQAAAAAAB4AIHNhbHRAbm90YXRpb25zLnNl cXVvaWEtcGdwLm9yZ/tr8E9NA10HvcAVlSxnox6z62KXCInWjZaiBIlgX6O5AxUKCAKbAQIeARYh BMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AADZHQD/Zx9nc3N2kj13AUsKMr/7zekBtgfSIGB3hRCU74Su G44A/34Yp6IAkndewLxb1WdRSokycnaCVyrk0nb4imeAYyoPtBc8ZGtnQGZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4u bmV0PojRBBMWCgCDBYJf6LTfBYkFn6YAAwsJBwkQ4JLrOlyhDbpHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3Rh dGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3JnL0Gwxvypz2tu1IPG+yu1zPjkiZwpscsitwrVvzN3bbADFQoI ApsBAh4BFiEEwp+KDAHzXjTYFqpc4JLrOlyhDboAAPkXAP0Z29z7jW+YzLzPTQML4EQLMbkHOfU4 +s+ki81Czt0WqgD/SJ8RyrqDCtEP8+E4ZSR01ysKqh+MUAsTaJlzZjehiQ24MwRf6LTfFgkrBgEE AdpHDwEBB0DkKHOW2kmqfAK461+acQ49gc2Z6VoXMChRqobGP0ubb4kBiAQYFgoBOgWCX+i03wWJ BZ+mAAkQ4JLrOlyhDbpHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3RhdGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3Jnfvo+ nHoxDwaLaJD8XZuXiaqBNZtIGXIypF1udBBRoc0CmwICHgG+oAQZFgoAbwWCX+i03wkQPp1xc3He VlxHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3RhdGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3JnaheiqE7Pfi3Atb3GGTw+ jFcBGOaobgzEJrhEuFpXREEWIQQttUkcnfDcj0MoY88+nXFzcd5WXAAAvrsBAIJ5sBg8Udocv25N stN/zWOiYpnjjvOjVMLH4fV3pWE1AP9T6hzHz7hRnAA8d01vqoxOlQ3O6cb/kFYAjqx3oMXSBhYh BMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AADX7gD/b83VObe14xrNP8xcltRrBZF5OE1rQSPkMNy+eWpk eCwA/1hxiS8ZxL5/elNjXiWuHXEvUGnRoVj745Vl48sZPVYMuDgEX+i03xIKKwYBBAGXVQEFAQEH QIGex1WZbH6xhUBve5mblScGYU+Y8QJOomXH+rr5tMsMAwEICYjJBBgWCgB7BYJf6LTfBYkFn6YA CRDgkus6XKENukcUAAAAAAAeACBzYWx0QG5vdGF0aW9ucy5zZXF1b2lhLXBncC5vcmcEAx9vTD3b J0SXkhvcRcCr6uIDJwic3KFKxkH1m4QW0QKbDAIeARYhBMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AAAX mwD8CWmukxwskU82RZLMk5fm1wCgMB5z8dA50KLw3rgsCykBAKg1w/Y7XpBS3SlXEegIg1K1e6dR fRxL7Z37WZXoH8AH
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 19:10:59 -0500
Message-ID: <878s7ovpm4.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/zdxjIvGR75zR2mdrj58OqY30nFk>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-01.txt
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 00:11:05 -0000

On Fri 2021-02-05 19:14:35 +0000, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> On 05/02/2021 17:55, Paul Wouters wrote:
> 
>> If you have read the -01 (and -00) version and it all looks good,
>> feel free to also let us know here on the list.
>
> Yes please - it'd be good to get a few such mails, so
> we know people are checking and all seems well. About
> 4 or 5 acks should be plenty if nobody finds problems.

I'm glad to see that several people in the WG appear to have reviewed
the diffs with reasonable attention to detail.

From what i can see, the only concerns raised were about subtle (and
potentially problematic) changes about the definition of whitespace for
ASCII-armored text, which probably shouldn't have made it into -01 .
The initial inclusion was my mistake -- in trying to help formulate a
set of changes that were minor textual changes, i shouldn't have
included it.  I've proposed dropping that set of changes from the draft
for now (hopefully someone can provide a cleaner fix).

Just a reminder here to please ack if you've read the changes -- and to
raise concerns if you've got them.  I'm grateful for the participation,
and think we should keep it going!

        --dkg