Re: [OPSAWG] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf [CORRECT]

Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> Mon, 28 September 2020 03:20 UTC

Return-Path: <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7569A3A0D09; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 20:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h82jM0WQbdeV; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 20:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 963D73A0D08; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 20:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml712-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 9AAE8FF457227CB9790B; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 04:20:04 +0100 (IST)
Received: from nkgeml707-chm.china.huawei.com (10.98.57.157) by lhreml712-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.63) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 04:20:03 +0100
Received: from nkgeml707-chm.china.huawei.com (10.98.57.157) by nkgeml707-chm.china.huawei.com (10.98.57.157) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 11:20:01 +0800
Received: from nkgeml707-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.98.57.157]) by nkgeml707-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.98.57.157]) with mapi id 15.01.1913.007; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 11:20:01 +0800
From: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>, opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IPR Poll for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf [CORRECT]
Thread-Index: AdaSPYvICTiAtXU/STiu/7vSqFRHIgDCJczw
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 03:20:01 +0000
Message-ID: <c9f46ac07b5b438bbbf39b334d701d32@huawei.com>
References: <f5f87ae6f92d423ebd8430a40fa7dd0f@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <f5f87ae6f92d423ebd8430a40fa7dd0f@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.243.128]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_c9f46ac07b5b438bbbf39b334d701d32huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/2f0jXAPj7cNbT26YivByDTdfitw>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf [CORRECT]
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 03:20:13 -0000

Hi All,

As a contributor, I am not aware of any IPR for this draft.

Cheers,
Tianran

From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2020 2:43 PM
To: opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf [CORRECT]


Sorry for attaching a wrong link to the draft. Please see as follows.



Hi Authors,



Accompany with the WG LC, this mail starts the IPR poll.



Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-04?



If you own or are aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-04, please clarify whether this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).



If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email in OPSAWG mailing list regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor.



If you are not listed as an author or contributor but are on OPSAWG mailing list, then please explicitly respond if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.



Thanks,

Tianran