IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] please see draft-lear-opsawg-ol on licensing

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 04 June 2021 10:12 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1943A31FE for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 03:12:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_FAIL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BeKCZEZxHkUx for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 03:12:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99CD23A31FB for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 03:12:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (p548dcc89.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.204.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FxJVY0jr3z2xGX; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 12:12:53 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D73F20E5-C64A-431F-9FCA-5B1B7ED3A3D4"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <8685_1622799260_60B9F39C_8685_106_16_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933035398A6D@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2021 12:12:52 +0200
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <71E78BA5-8B70-4827-9809-11DF0C118F4D@tzi.org>
References: <340b29f4-e867-6a5d-b45c-8c8b9e45eb47@lear.ch> <13971_1622193488_60B0B550_13971_295_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93303539075F@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <674c45ce-6b84-b50c-2d43-27839015123a@lear.ch> <5343_1622203174_60B0DB26_5343_176_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933035393109@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <12487.1622212092@localhost> <21263_1622212875_60B1010B_21263_105_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93303539447E@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <31454.1622239977@localhost> <30792_1622448622_60B499EE_30792_414_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933035394DFC@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <45505E41-664E-433F-940A-1F724561646D@tzi.org> <8685_1622799260_60B9F39C_8685_106_16_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933035398A6D@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/2uJnaaZl8DpYB_DDVPAuYhNE4zk>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] please see draft-lear-opsawg-ol on licensing
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2021 10:12:59 -0000

On 4. Jun 2021, at 11:34, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:
> 
> What I'm really concerned about is consistent use of the "update" header.

That’s the IESG’s job — above my paygrade :-)

What I’m concerned is that 8520 readers find a pointer to the new document.
An “updated by” on the (metadata rich versions of) 8520 raises the likelihood substantially.
Which is more important than any concept of consistency (which we won’t really have until the IESG is done with Mirja’s proposals).

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email