IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] please see draft-lear-opsawg-ol on licensing

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 04 June 2021 06:53 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C810B3A2C29 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 23:53:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_FAIL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CI8as9hVr01a for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 23:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 435883A2C21 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 23:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcc89.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.204.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FxD406fwmz2xG0; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 08:53:04 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <30792_1622448622_60B499EE_30792_414_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933035394DFC@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2021 08:53:03 +0200
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 644482378.731056-f8444896607a2bd757b2a749eac1f550
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <45505E41-664E-433F-940A-1F724561646D@tzi.org>
References: <340b29f4-e867-6a5d-b45c-8c8b9e45eb47@lear.ch> <13971_1622193488_60B0B550_13971_295_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93303539075F@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <674c45ce-6b84-b50c-2d43-27839015123a@lear.ch> <5343_1622203174_60B0DB26_5343_176_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933035393109@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <12487.1622212092@localhost> <21263_1622212875_60B1010B_21263_105_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93303539447E@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <31454.1622239977@localhost> <30792_1622448622_60B499EE_30792_414_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933035394DFC@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/qu0HFW9FAqNhi2k9lUbYgop8gz8>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] please see draft-lear-opsawg-ol on licensing
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2021 06:53:14 -0000

On 2021-05-31, at 10:10, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote:
> 
> If so, every extension (including modules with augment) would be tagged as updating their base RFC...while this is not the case. There are plenty examples out there. 

This is not a syntactical issue (augment and all that), but a semantic one:
RFC 8520 is updated with a "SHOULD use this".  That is the RFC 8520 update, not the new module.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email