Re: [OPSAWG] Call for adoption, draft-krishnan-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing/

Sanjay Khanna <skhanna@brocade.com> Thu, 25 April 2013 00:33 UTC

Return-Path: <skhanna@brocade.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F9C21F905B for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.265
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Grdly0BKLXXy for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-000f0801.pphosted.com (mx0a-000f0801.pphosted.com [67.231.144.122]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDDD421F8B60 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:33:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0000542 [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-000f0801.pphosted.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r3P0VxWh028986 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:33:53 -0700
Received: from hq1wp-exchub01.corp.brocade.com ([144.49.131.13]) by mx0a-000f0801.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 1bx4w6gpe1-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:33:53 -0700
Received: from HQ1WP-EXHUB02.corp.brocade.com (10.70.38.14) by HQ1WP-EXCHUB01.corp.brocade.com (10.70.36.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:33:52 -0700
Received: from HQ1-EXCH03.corp.brocade.com ([fe80::411c:2971:c59e:5e4a]) by HQ1WP-EXHUB02.corp.brocade.com ([fe80::e1f4:a4c8:696b:3780%10]) with mapi; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:33:51 -0700
From: Sanjay Khanna <skhanna@brocade.com>
To: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:33:47 -0700
Thread-Topic: [OPSAWG] Call for adoption, draft-krishnan-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing/
Thread-Index: Ac417apip45aKsUHR1qclkHuvoSelgAQ6LEQAAAvQ4AAA33EgAAEvvQwATShwtABiYfPYA==
Message-ID: <01BBBD108B29DC41B5F97F1B7F458E08280FE90A32@HQ1-EXCH03.corp.brocade.com>
References: <51656616.4070003@gmail.com> <C7634EB63EFD984A978DFB46EA5174F2BFD818D95B@HQ1-EXCH01.corp.brocade.com> <01BBBD108B29DC41B5F97F1B7F458E08280FD4D184@HQ1-EXCH03.corp.brocade.com> <C7634EB63EFD984A978DFB46EA5174F2BFD818E47C@HQ1-EXCH01.corp.brocade.com>
In-Reply-To: <C7634EB63EFD984A978DFB46EA5174F2BFD818E47C@HQ1-EXCH01.corp.brocade.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8626, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-04-24_08:2013-04-24, 2013-04-24, 1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=2 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1211240000 definitions=main-1304240244
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:05:04 -0700
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for adoption, draft-krishnan-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing/
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 00:33:54 -0000

Folks,

I am supporting the draft as a co-author. We have seen problems in carrier networks where large flows can trump small flows. This draft is presenting some solutions to the problem which will be beneficial in solving this problem in provider networks. 

Regards,
Sanjay

-----Original Message-----
From: opsawg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Melinda Shore
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 6:16 AM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] Call for adoption, draft-krishnan-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing/

This is a call for working group adoption of http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krishnan-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing/.

The authors report that they've incorporated feedback given at the IETF 86 meeting, in particular
  . information model for flow rebalancing
  . operational considerations

We'll be assessing consensus on 24 April 2013.

Thanks,

Melinda
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg