Re: [OPSAWG] Call for adoption, draft-krishnan-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing/

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Wed, 24 April 2013 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0537121F8AA6 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.385
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.385 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.214, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pl4cwBnooEoF for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81DAF21F8A6B for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from joels-MacBook-Air.local (host-64-47-153-50.masergy.com [64.47.153.50]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3OHvWSL087859 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:57:33 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <51781D07.1040308@bogus.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:57:27 -0700
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:21.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/21.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>, opsawg@ietf.org, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>
References: <51656616.4070003@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <51656616.4070003@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:57:33 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for adoption, draft-krishnan-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing/
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:57:36 -0000

Folks,

I came to the attention of the Chairs and the ADs during the call for 
adoption that an IPR disclosure was likely pending on this draft. It has 
since transpired.

The disclosure can be reviewed here.

http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=document_search&id_document_tag=draft-krishnan-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing.

In my opinion this is bit late frankly but short of 6701 remedy 
territory. I have asked the chairs to extend the current call for 
additional time (which they should chime in on), and I would ask that if 
the disclosure alters you opinion of the document that you please make 
your concerns known.

I'd like to thank the authors for their candor, and the chairs for 
bringing this to our attention.

Joel


On 4/10/13 6:16 AM, Melinda Shore wrote:
> This is a call for working group adoption of
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krishnan-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing/.
>
> The authors report that they've incorporated feedback given at
> the IETF 86 meeting, in particular
>    . information model for flow rebalancing
>    . operational considerations
>
> We'll be assessing consensus on 24 April 2013.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Melinda
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>