Re: [OPSAWG] Call for adoption, draft-krishnan-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing/

+1.

In addition to this type of solution being applicable to traditional
networks, I believe it is particularly important to research and education
networks that frequently carry large flows.

Thanks.
pete

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Mcdysan, David E <dave.mcdysan@verizon.com
> wrote:

> I support adoption of this draft.
>
> There are several operational use cases for this form of load balancing in
> our networks.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dave
>
>
> From: opsawg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Melinda Shore
> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 6:16 AM
> To: opsawg@ietf.org
> Subject: [OPSAWG] Call for adoption,
> draft-krishnan-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing/
>
> This is a call for working group adoption of
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krishnan-opsawg-large-flow-load-balan
> cing/.
>
> The authors report that they've incorporated feedback given at the IETF 86
> meeting, in particular
>   . information model for flow rebalancing
>   . operational considerations
>
> We'll be assessing consensus on 24 April 2013.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Melinda
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>