[OPSAWG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8520 (6295)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 23 September 2020 20:09 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFEE93A1487 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wEMvZOXSEIKR for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:09:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD3413A1485 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:09:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 1D5F3F40768; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:09:02 -0700 (PDT)
To: lear@cisco.com, rdroms@gmail.com, dromasca@gmail.com, warren@kumari.net, rwilton@cisco.com, henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de, jclarke@cisco.com, zhoutianran@huawei.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rat+ietf@tlrmx.org, opsawg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20200923200902.1D5F3F40768@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:09:02 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/NmbT6bs5_kWhk45qnXwP80rVJJ8>
Subject: [OPSAWG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8520 (6295)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 20:09:12 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8520,
"Manufacturer Usage Description Specification".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6295

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Nick Lamb <rat+ietf@tlrmx.org>

Section: 4.1

Original Text
-------------
For example, if one saw the line "manufacturer" : "flobbidy.example.com",
then all Things that registered with a MUD URL that contained flobbity.example.com in its authority section would match.

Corrected Text
--------------
For example, if one saw the line "manufacturer" : "flobbity.example.com",
then all Things that registered with a MUD URL that contained flobbity.example.com in its authority section would match.

Notes
-----
Taken at face value it implies somehow a MUD Manager knows about a relationship between two different names flobbidy.example.com and flobbity.example.com in an unexplained way, the correction removes this confusion.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC8520 (draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-25)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Manufacturer Usage Description Specification
Publication Date    : March 2019
Author(s)           : E. Lear, R. Droms, D. Romascanu
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Operations and Management Area Working Group
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG