Re: [OPSAWG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8520 (6295)

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 24 September 2020 04:41 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DCA93A0C06 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 21:41:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vn9SgGQ-dI5r for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 21:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D74AB3A0B95 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 21:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82866389AA; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:20:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id QpB1BZDrF6Dc; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:20:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84845389A4; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:20:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D8E373; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:41:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Joe Clarke \(jclarke\)" <jclarke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "rat+ietf\@tlrmx.org" <rat+ietf@tlrmx.org>, "rdroms\@gmail.com" <rdroms@gmail.com>, "opsawg\@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <69977489-BAA2-43A8-9047-FD4047977167@cisco.com>
References: <20200923200902.1D5F3F40768@rfc-editor.org> <69977489-BAA2-43A8-9047-FD4047977167@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:41:28 -0400
Message-ID: <29232.1600922488@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/jFHyaz3nmJMOzPaCI02WGSgjSkA>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8520 (6295)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 04:41:49 -0000

Joe Clarke \(jclarke\) <jclarke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
    > Looks like a straight typo and the correct outlined here makes sense to
    > me.

I agree.
I had to read if four times to see the one letter difference!

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide