IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] opsawg-sdi was Re: example in tacacs yang was Re: Shepherd review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Fri, 19 June 2020 14:02 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BDAC3A0A0C for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 07:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id On-14nnZQFnw for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 07:02:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F2273A09FF for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 07:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id o4so5627429lfi.7 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 07:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VVn8N/SGrWMqnLJvofIIBWzMCLQ8TUpJN3L13kHO6OY=; b=AHX3N9KH//JcshMp9vEnhHoFGdjCaJ7eKWOMoOrCY8m+2vyZHizj80sp2yTQicNp0A 92Gjfo7BJDMMel2m7hbt2ZG4ctsGk7LS5S2xh1RlgyaOng1My3tSQo9lzjBS9rT9BzYa 0jIatSPr6cHDYIwQLH9lLCeqj1ypIoe7x7UbAao0rZ4rs5hQm1VmxLlGmHxqSoNe+bxd 1VugJxTC0c7S+PDTFdjA8/7rSN1ILLjzrZA7VylI2f61iLJQcm9V2KAr1tn7Eu1/xsUV vbHI1iSS3a3Js+tAraKD1pncjFY+OnKqZQJeZuo94XMUsrxQhVvNcYnPvaJkvAgbQyhZ O30Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VVn8N/SGrWMqnLJvofIIBWzMCLQ8TUpJN3L13kHO6OY=; b=TIg1zJXX5wZxeu2LutagQgiqgKOeZPfDriOuJklola7zmtY6vqFMlhYEeNfkV/BaY2 G37tF2gHkF3otJRS5ikrnHJw3JN9P351og4Fw36pkkbTiCwAtc2P1n1gXd0v1z9Us24Y Zv0v1ZlAPlGGyOY22iH+IP7dkM12AC6cQTV0adeRFVyxVIcXCwsKJOHblwqyzsFlJTxA 842d37x9bkINEx91R4Nhw4p5+If/bkZuWFcpKHy//IiIfUFOXDEm2AYFuhJjxtyf/Fp9 b2ttyG1x8GDr0glHulRjSTkxnnZmVik9XzdqXM5Faf3X39ki4gRuyPsBQNrGrWvgha0i IYHQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532jqQlFroL4eFqhRCbWYhZDh1scpz9WO1ziX8hNsWuXjGwIvcvO AXP82oZI/lMzcxRCD4rgNdDKFhfSt40gSn1YNZWo/Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyQDkIsA4WWfzOqOXQGrqcwO6YUEGQZtwT+crlgV/C8pn1Lv8Dg8IuuxbYLt0a/HFThUDsN3b/8neuv/sO+Z/c=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:104c:: with SMTP id c12mr2074068lfb.200.1592575329802; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 07:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <3C7473F5-75CE-4A80-BEF7-AD6431E031F1@cisco.com> <DBAPR07MB7016F5548BFF458EA8422D23A09B0@DBAPR07MB7016.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <63365A66-53E0-4ABD-9903-DC8F96D33D92@cisco.com> <DBAPR07MB70168CDBE2D3528E722BEF93A0980@DBAPR07MB7016.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DBAPR07MB70168CDBE2D3528E722BEF93A0980@DBAPR07MB7016.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 10:01:33 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iLRdNgzU8pOAvdUHEuPc-JGqonFKOKY-=M7ctE=6CJZNQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
Cc: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>, opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/wFU1Ne8l8TjBEhJzfLLGCxqEyxA>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] opsawg-sdi was Re: example in tacacs yang was Re: Shepherd review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 14:02:14 -0000

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 7:03 AM tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> wrote:
>
> From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke@cisco.com>
> Sent: 18 June 2020 18:16
> To: tom petch
> Cc: opsawg; draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: example in tacacs yang was Re: Shepherd review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang
> > On Jun 18, 2020, at 12:01, tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: OPSAWG <opsawg-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> > Sent: 28 May 2020 15:52
>
> Joe
>
> Looking at sdi-12 I see that it has added a reference to DHXPv6 in Section 2; the Introduction has DHCPv6

Gargh! Stupid keyboard with X and C right next to each other :-) Fixed
in the github version...

Thank you!
W

>
> Tom Petch.
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > Looking at the example in tacacs-yang-06  I see it uses an address of 10.10..10.x. I think that this should be an address reserved for documentation 192.0.2 if I recall.
>
> Yep, good catch.  Authors, can you update to something in 192.0.2.0/24?  Thanks.
>
> Joe
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email